• danielfgom
    link
    English
    -629 days ago

    Who said anything about a conspiracy? I’m just saying they may be acting selfishly and it couldn’t hurt to speak to other parties who they know use their code, to discuss how it will impact them.

    • @TheGrandNagus
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      You did. To quote your assertion:

      It’s deliberately breaking backwards compatibility to force other projects that use that code to either look bland like Gnome or stop making their DE’s.

      You’re asserting that the Gnome team is secretly working together (i.e. conspiring) with the explicit aim of enforcing DEs to look like Gnome (idk how they could force that but whatever), or to stop making their DEs altogether (similarly, I can’t see the logic there. Unless you believe that only Gnome devs are skilled enough to make Linux programs and other DEs just have to take what Gnome makes. But that’s an absurd suggestion).

      • danielfgom
        link
        English
        129 days ago

        It’s not a conspiracy. All I was saying is that by breaking backwards compatibility downstream either has to comply or find another way.

        As another commentor has mentioned, gnome did actually inform downstream a good while back but downstream did not engage, so gnome obviously proceeded with their own project how they saw fit. Which is the right way of course.

        Downstream should have tried to engage and perhaps found a good work around but sadly didn’t.

        So they’ll have to work it out now by themselves.