cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15001340

“Such an invasion could lead to horrific massacres and raise scenarios of a second Nakba,” the Gaza-based Palestinian Center for Human Rights said recently. “After 200 days of horrific genocidal acts in Gaza, the real objectives of the attack are the continuation of the 76-year-long ongoing Nakba and the erasure and genocidal destruction of the Palestinian people in Gaza. Israel is laying the groundwork to fulfill its settler-colonial plan of colonizing Gaza.”

Human rights defenders have warned that Israel may ultimately seek to ethnically cleanse as many Palestinians as possible from Gaza.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -218 months ago

    So 3 out of 341,352,598 Americans then, according to you. And you feel that’s a fair representation.

    Seems to me you forgot to put on your critical thinking cap today.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      118 months ago

      If you can’t tell the difference between a limited number of well known examples and a statistical percentage, then perhaps you shouldn’t lecture others on thinking.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -158 months ago

        If you had provided an analytical statistical source instead of “three well-known individuals” we wouldn’t be having this discussion.

        • NoIWontPickAName
          link
          fedilink
          118 months ago

          Really? Fighting just to fight? Be better, you knew that that was only supposed to be an example of well known Jewish people standing up against Israel, not a comprehensive breakdown of the whole population.

          I’ll be your fucking huckleberry though, I can fight about stupid shit just to piss people off all day.

          I find it funny and it keeps you from bothering others.

          Bring it

    • @atomicorange
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      Are you disagreeing with the thesis of the comment above, or just critiquing the quality of their data?

      If you disagree with the thesis, can you explain what your position is?