• MxM111
    link
    fedilink
    185 months ago

    70 Wh/Kg is indeed very low density comparing with today’s li-ion 300 Wh/kg.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      English
      265 months ago

      Yeah but for many low-power applications, it’s a damn cool development. Like I have a bluetooth keyboard and a few controllers that could eaisly fit a battery 3x-4x the current size inside no problem, so there’s no need to waste lithium on that.

    • haui
      link
      fedilink
      English
      165 months ago

      At 1000 times the abundancy, it is already 233 times better for stationary applications than lithium ion, no?

        • haui
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 months ago

          Probably more like x times more profit if we cant get competition going

    • @mipadaitu
      link
      English
      135 months ago

      Still great for grid storage. Save the higher density stuff for cars, trucks, and space.

    • @Cornelius_Wangenheim
      link
      English
      125 months ago

      LiPo batteries are the more comparable type and are in the 140-200 Wh/kg range. For version 1.0, that’s not a bad number.

    • @Holyginz
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      The problem with advancing these batteries is the barrier to entry. Very few are willing to invest in advancing lithium free batteries when li-ion batteries are inexpensive and have been improving. There needs to be a minimum advancement before people are willing to adopt the new technology and get it up to and beyond where we currently are. Hopefully I explained that in an understandable way lol.