She’s almost 70, spend all day watching q-anon style of videos (but in Spanish) and every day she’s anguished about something new, last week was asking us to start digging a nuclear shelter because Russia was dropped a nuclear bomb over Ukraine. Before that she was begging us to install reinforced doors because the indigenous population were about to invade the cities and kill everyone with poisonous arrows. I have access to her YouTube account and I’m trying to unsubscribe and report the videos, but the reccomended videos keep feeding her more crazy shit.

  • المنطقة عكف عفريت
    link
    31 year ago

    I guess despite them being Qanon, I still see and believe in the human in them, and their ultimate right to believe stupid shit. I don’t think it’s ever ‘overthinking’ when it comes to another human being’s privacy and freedom. I actually think it’s bizarre to quickly jump into this and decide to alter the subscriptions behind their back like they’re a 2 year old child with not even perception to understand basic shit.

    • @Historical_General
      link
      -4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nobody said this had to be an instant/quick reaction to anything. If you can see that somebody has ‘chosen’ to fall into a rabbithole and self destruct, becoming an angrier, more hateful (bigoted) and miserable person because of algorithms, dark patterns and unnatural infinite content spirals, I’d recognise that it isn’t organic or human-made but in fact done for the profit motive of a large corporation, and do the obvious thing.

      If you’re on Lemmy because you hate billionaire interference in your life why allow it to psychologically infect your family far more insidiously on youtube?

        • @Historical_General
          link
          -41 year ago

          Well, you argued that it’s ‘bizarre to quickly jump’ into it and interfere.

          I’m not sure what your point is here.

          • المنطقة عكف عفريت
            link
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I guess what I’m saying is that I’ll think twice before deciding something isn’t for someone to the point where I’d have to interfere without their own knowledge and consent (as opposed to talking to them).

            The problem with censorship is that one always assumes they are correct and the other person is deluded. In many cases, like this one, it could be true. In others, it’s not. My point was to take caution when deciding something about someone’s life.