“We have to stop destroying the planet as we feed ourselves,” a World Bank official said, as red meat and dairy drive CO2 emissions.

Cows and milk are out, chicken and broccoli are in — if the World Bank has its way, that is.

In a new paper, the international financial lender suggests repurposing the billions rich countries spend to boost CO2-rich products like red meat and dairy for more climate-friendly options like poultry, fruits and vegetables. It’s one of the most cost-effective ways to save the planet from climate change, the bank argues.

The politically touchy recommendation — sure to make certain conservatives and European countries apoplectic — is one of several suggestions the World Bank offers to cut climate-harming pollution from the agricultural and food sectors, which are responsible for nearly a third of global greenhouse gas emissions.

The paper comes at a diplomatically strategic moment, as countries signed on to the Paris Agreement — the global pact calling to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius — prepare to update their climate plans by late 2025.

  • Tiefling IRL
    link
    fedilink
    English
    196 months ago

    My arguments to “if it’s not from an animal or isn’t milk” are:

    1. What do you call the white liquid inside a coconut?
    2. What do you call the laxative/antacid that comes in a blue bottle?
    • @Gigasser
      link
      English
      36 months ago

      It would be funny if you just started calling it coconut malk instead of milk. Literally just changing the word milk by one letter.

    • @AA5B
      link
      English
      26 months ago
      1. Gross
      2. Also gross