• @chocolatine
    link
    148 months ago

    I guess it’s more to avoid drivers to go too wide than a security measure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      The problem is that it is a tradeoff on driver safety. A gravel trap negates the advantage of going off track, but in turn it is less effective at slowing a car down in case of an accident, and so it leads to higher impact speeds.

      Edit: Here’s a great video on the topic https://youtu.be/5N06z6VHXGA?si=6sLHvfF9N6dKOHc1

      Chain Bear, in case you read this, we miss you, please come back!

      • @supercriticalcheese
        link
        48 months ago

        Exactly what I was thinking, how did it get approved in the first place I wonder 🤔

        Chain Bear, in case you read this, we miss you, please come back!

        agreed

      • @Everythingispenguins
        link
        18 months ago

        I have always wondered if there could be a little strip of gravel next to the track and then switch back the tarmac. It would keep drivers from dipping their toes off the track and still provide the safety of a tarmac run off.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          48 months ago

          A little strip of gravel is still capable of rolling a car, and also makes the track dirty when a car goes through it. A strip of grass could work.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        I wonder if it would be better to put speed bumps like they do on chicanes in some tracks to negate the advantage, they could be positioned in an orientation so that the car is unlikely to go over them when running off track but will if going wider for the corner 🤔