Misinformation campaigns increasingly target the cavity-fighting mineral, prompting communities to reverse mandates. Dentists are enraged. Parents are caught in the middle.

The culture wars have a new target: your teeth.

Communities across the U.S. are ending public water fluoridation programs, often spurred by groups that insist that people should decide whether they want the mineral — long proven to fight cavities — added to their water supplies.

The push to flush it from water systems seems to be increasingly fueled by pandemic-related mistrust of government oversteps and misleading claims, experts say, that fluoride is harmful.

The anti-fluoridation movement gained steam with Covid,” said Dr. Meg Lochary, a pediatric dentist in Union County, North Carolina. “We’ve seen an increase of people who either don’t want fluoride or are skeptical about it.”

There should be no question about the dental benefits of fluoride, Lochary and other experts say. Major public health groups, including the American Dental Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, support the use of fluoridated water. All cite studies that show it reduces tooth decay by 25%.

    • Kalkaline
      link
      fedilink
      59
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      AND THEY DON’T SEEM TO LIKE THE FACT THAT THEY HAVE THE FREEDOM TO FILTER THE FLUORIDE BACK OUT OF THE WATER.

      • @Fedizen
        link
        88 months ago

        fluoride is not easy to filter - its smaller than water molecules.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -858 months ago

        Right.

        Let’s put any amount of contaminates in our drinking water just so people can “filter them out.”

        I swear, some of you people are just too far gone.

        • Flying Squid
          link
          658 months ago

          Again, there are places where fluoride occurs naturally in drinking water at higher concentrations than it is added artificially and there don’t seem to be significant health problems.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Hmmmmm no ! I’m not against fluoride in water, I don’t care since I don’t live in north america but spreading disinformation does not help.

            There is regions, especially in India, where fluoride occurs by naturally in water in high concentration which is causing multiple serious health issues.

            Neurology of endemic skeletal fluorosis

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              87 months ago

              “There are higher concentrations of fluoride in water than we usually put in it that is still healthy to drink” != “Any concentration of fluoride in water is safe”

              Any substance becomes toxic if you ingest too much of it. If you exceed by a factor of 20 the amount of plenty of things people usually consume, it isn’t difficult to find things that are dangerous or even lethal. Say, coffee, beer, anti-inflammatories, chocolate, Coke.

            • Flying Squid
              link
              47 months ago

              Cool. I said higher concentrations that are added artificially, not extremely high concentration.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                27 months ago

                there are places where fluoride occurs naturally in drinking water at higher concentrations than it is added artificially and there don’t seem to be significant health problems.

                I’m simply replying that there is places where fluoride occurs naturally in drinking water at higher concentration that it is added artificially and there is significant health problems in these places.

                Does it means that fluoride in low concentration like in the US water system is dangerous ? No, it just means that very high concentration can be dangerous.

                • Flying Squid
                  link
                  37 months ago

                  I was talking about concentrations in the U.S. I think that should have been obvious.