“I expect a semi-dystopian future with substantial pain and suffering for the people of the Global South,” one expert said.

  • @Burn_The_Right
    link
    English
    71 month ago

    but the ones in power don’t seem to give a shit.

    Conservatives also don’t give a shit.

    • DarkThoughts
      link
      fedilink
      51 month ago

      The majority of people on both sides of the spectrum don’t give a shit. People need to stop acting like this is just politicians, or CEOs, when it is the vast majority of the voters & potential voters. You’d see a lot more votes towards green parties & candidates if it were different. But the truth is, most people don’t want to lose their comfortable lifestyle. Real climate action would affect us all, in our lives, in the prices we have to pay for products, in the products available to us, how we move around, etc etc.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        But the truth is, most people don’t want to lose their comfortable lifestyle.

        The real truth is, the notion that a lower-carbon lifestyle is somehow inferior to our current car-dependent bullshit is 100000% fallacious bullshit brainwashed into us by the automobile industry. Walkability is just better in every way (environmentally, economically, sociologically) and people whose lifestyle doesn’t depend on cars are, statistically, happier and healthier than people who do.

        • DarkThoughts
          link
          fedilink
          01 month ago

          Now try to explain that people have to give up their job that’s in the neighboring city, or having to get up 1-2 hours earlier due to bad train or bus connections, or that they now cannot get groceries anymore because they live in suburbia and have to drive an hour out to some massive parking lot desert to shop in their IKEA sized grocery halls. And that’s just relating to the personal transport sector.

          • @grue
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            Why do you persist in assuming that all those shitty circumstances would continue to exist when they are exactly the things I’m saying we should be fixing? The whole idea is to have lots of nearby employers, good train and bus connections, grocery stores within walking distance (and with little to no parking), etc.

            The #1 priority for reducing climate change (and fixing almost all our problems, from housing affordability to obesity) is zoning reform.

            • DarkThoughts
              link
              fedilink
              01 month ago

              Because no one is willing to change those things. No politician who would be willing to go this far would be voted in because of the intermediate issues this would cause for people. And doing a super slow transition would be too late at this point, especially since we’re way past schedule already in regards to our emission models. It even starts with the simple fact that people are simply not willing to get rid of their cars, even if public transport was good and completely free. So you’d be left with enforcing people not to drive, which is obviously also not going to happen for the same reasons.

              The #1 priority for reducing climate change (and fixing almost all our problems, from housing affordability to obesity) is zoning reform.

              Only in countries like the US, who have a disproportional large portion of transport emissions. But a lot of our emissions in the West simply come from the production of our goods that we buy and give us our comfy lives.

              • Dojan
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                It even starts with the simple fact that people are simply not willing to get rid of their cars, even if public transport was good and completely free. So you’d be left with enforcing people not to drive, which is obviously also not going to happen for the same reasons.

                Induced demand can work in reverse. Stop expanding roads. Redesignate some lanes to public transport only. Why take the car and sit in a queue for 2 hours when a bus can get you to work in 30 minutes without any queues?

                • DarkThoughts
                  link
                  fedilink
                  11 month ago

                  That’s a decades long process. We need proper action done within this decade.

                  Why take the car and sit in a queue for 2 hours when a bus can get you to work in 30 minutes without any queues?

                  You’d be surprised how many people would take that over a ride with other people.

                  • Dojan
                    link
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    That’s a decades long process. We need proper action done within this decade.

                    We don’t know that. If it turns out that the actual ECS value is higher than predicted we’re already fucked because whatever faction we might take today should’ve already been taken decades ago. If a global humanitarian crisis is mere decades away, no changes we’ll feasibly make today or in the near future will stave it off.

                    You’d be surprised how many people would take that over a ride with other people.

                    An alternative is also that those who can, do their job remotely. Covid proved the feasibility of that. You couldn’t pay me enough to start commuting or doing my own grocery runs again. I only go outside for enjoyment and none of it involves vehicles. Unless said vehicle is a bicycle, because my dog really enjoys cycling.

              • @grue
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                deleted by creator

    • @postmateDumbass
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      I think they give a shit.

      Enjoyment counts as giving a shit.