An 8x5 rectangle. If the bottom left corner is considered (0, 0), then two lines are drawn within the rectangle, from (0, 4) to (8, 1) and from (1, 5) to (7, 0). The smaller two regions of the four these lines cut the rectangle into are shaded. What is their combined area?

  • @morphballganon
    link
    8
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    6.5 square units

    The description doesn’t match the image. The image shows two lines that intersect. The description’s lines would not intersect as stated. My answer is for the image, not the description.

    The first line’s coordinates should be 0,4 to 8,1. The second should be 1,5 to 7,0.

    I see you corrected it.

    • @TootSweet
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Huh. I got 7.5 square units. Now I’m rechecking my calculations frantically. Lol.

      I guess there’s no rule against posting your work.

      I divided it in half down the middle and made a note to double my answer at the end.

      The whole half rectangle has an area of 20. The trapezoid below has an area of (2.5+4)*4/2=13. The triangle above has an area of 3*2.5/2=3.25. 20-13-3.25=3.75. Multiplying that by 2 (because that 3.75 is only the area of the top left half of the shaded portion) gives 7.5.

      Edit: Bah! Never mind. Found my mistake. 3*2.5/2=3.75, not 3.25. With that fix I get 6.5.

      • zkfcfbzrOP
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Posting work is encouraged 🙂

        You’ve got it, it’s 6.5. I actually posted this problem because I originally found the answer using trig, which seemed a bit too brute-force-y, especially considering the original source for this problem - I wanted to see if others could/would find the simpler solution that I assumed existed. And you did ^_^

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          48 months ago

          I tried it just using the area of a kite, but ended up with sqrt(2)*sqrt(22.25) and got ~6.67 I made a mistake somewhere I guess.

          • zkfcfbzrOP
            link
            English
            68 months ago

            The issue there is it isn’t a kite: The two longer sides don’t have equal length - they’re sqrt(73)/2 and sqrt(61)/2. So it’s a decent approximation but not quite exact.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              One doesn’t really see this if the image is oriented like that. Rotating your phone or your head so that the vertical axis matches the long diagonal of the ‘kite’ makes this difference more obvious.