- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Russia already has nuclear warheads on its own soil that are close to Ukraine and NATO countries, but by basing some in Belarus, the Kremlin appears to be trying to accentuate its nuclear threat and bolster its nuclear deterrent.
Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, made reference to such a site early last year, saying Russia would soon be completing the construction of “special storage for tactical nuclear weapons” in Belarus.
The New York Times analyzed satellite imagery and photos, and spoke with nuclear weapons and arms control experts, to track the new construction, which started in March 2023.
The site is 120 miles north of the Ukrainian border at a military depot next to the town of Asipovichy. Some of the recently built structures there have features that are unique to nuclear storage facilities at bases inside Russia. For example, a new, highly secure area is surrounded by three layers of fencing, in addition to the existing security perimeter of the entire base. Another telltale sign is a covered loading area connected to what appears to be a concealed Soviet-era underground bunker.
Turns out Ukraine should never have given up their nuclear weapons. Russia broke the deal anyway. And expecting a ‘we won’t invade you’ deal to last in perpetuity after they gave up their leverage was silly anyway.
Ukraine neither had control of those nuclear weapons, nor the ability to maintain them. It is probably for the best for humanity that they were removed. This is acknowledged by ICANW.
https://www.icanw.org/did_ukraine_give_up_nuclear_weapons
Nah, fuck that. That was likely the final dumb decision that Ukraine will ever make if they learned from history. There is a reason nukes work well to deter bullies: you can respond back with disproportionate force to make them regret their decisions.
Did you just not read anything in my post? A nuke you can’t use isn’t a deterrent. It’s a risk to yourself.
Where Ukraine messed up was getting a security agreement and not a security guarantee in the Budapest Memorandum.