This piece explores Russia’s long history of antisemitism, alongside its current antisemitic disinformation and propaganda campaign targeting American youth. Tabarovsky also looks at Russia’s likeminded partners, and the implications for US national security.
No offense, but this sounds like Israel Lobby propaganda. Not credible. You would think that the Israel Lobby controlling and influencing US foreign policy a conspiracy theory, only to realize it is fact.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/woodrow-wilson-international-center-for-scholars/
Almost all Western media is propaganda because omission is in fact propaganda. That Russia accused Israel of colluding with ISIS in the Crocus attack is news to me. This is the first time seeing this. I thought Putin accused the United States and even Ukraine. The US has a verified history of supplying jihadist against enemies. Woodrow International Center is no exception. I already spotted propaganda in the few minutes of peering into the content. The strategy of propaganda is to convince people of truth by the method of telling no lie, but at the same time leaving out damning truths. Sorry, but your bot website does not remotely convince me. That website is not all that “factual”. It is very opinionated and one-sided.
Interesting opinion. Not the first time I heard of it (to be clear, Russia wasn’t accusing, it was social media users and Dugin). If you’re concerned with mbfc, this may not be the sub for you.
https://gnet-research.org/2024/04/23/moscow-attack-the-popularisation-of-far-right-conspiracy-theories-in-mainstream-media/
There are American anti-Zionist, they are even Jewish anti-Zionist, and there are conspiracy theorists of all nationalities. What Russian citizens post on social media is not always going to be the stance of the Kremlin. This article you posted is an anti-Russian, pro-Israel Lobby propaganda; knocking out 2 birds with one stone? It has absolutely no credibility.
You could try providing high reliability sources that show something in the article is propaganda. Otherwise I think you just don’t like the article for personal reasons. And I really am losing your point about who was accusing who of the crocus attack.
It is a disingenuous website. Another propaganda website is the Bush Foundation. This is how the Bush Foundation operates: everybody in the world wants freedom and democracy, so we’re going to give it to them with freedom bombs, and everybody will live happily ever after, because they have democracy, and they have freedom. Western think tanks justify US foreign policy. Western think tanks recommended that Ukraine join NATO before the Russian invasion. What for? What does the US want in Ukraine? Democracy? They already had democracy and apparently, in 2014, they didn’t like it. Not to mention, Ukraine is bounded by internationally recognized treaty to be neutral as a prerequisite for independence. The “think tank” thought a great idea to get Ukraine into NATO for the purpose of provoking a Russian invasion. That is exactly the point of this whole exercise. Listen, I read different perspectives, I know phony information and ulterior information; they are fundamentally disinformation, and misinformation. Another thing that might surprise you, democratic states create far more lies than autocracies, because for a democracy to control the people, and not actually represent them, they have to lie. Democratic government produce their own conforming elites who don’t fully represent the people. An autocracy does not need to lie to you, because it can do what it wants. Western news media is a joke. They totally create narratives for the foreign policy establishment. Why? Because they are loyal to their party, of course, but “free market” news media does not need to tell the truth to generate revenue or news.