Service charges; resort fees; “surcharge” add-ons: If you’ve been startled by unexpected fees when you pay your check at a restaurant — or book a hotel room or buy a ticket to a game, you’re far from alone. But if you live in California, change is coming. A new state law requiring price transparency is set to take effect in July.

“The law is simple: the price you see is the price you pay,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said on Wednesday, as his office issued long-awaited guidance about a law that applies to thousands of businesses in a wide range of sectors.

Restaurant owners like Laurie Thomas, who heads the Golden Gate Restaurant Association, say the changes will bring higher prices and sticker shock, which could then raise a psychological hurdle in customers’ dining habits. That, in turn, will hurt restaurants and their workers, she warns.

“If it’s in the core price of the menu, there will be a pullback” in patrons’ spending, she told NPR shortly before the attorney general released the guidelines. "There are some people, I think, that are hoping that the restaurants will just absorb that cost, because we’ve seen people say, ‘Oh, it’s too expensive with the service charge.’ "

Restaurant Association head thinks it’s perfectly OK to mislead customers into thinking that prices are lower than they actually are, and gouge them after they’ve consumed/used the product. Because having knowledge of true prices would cause some customers to make informed decisions that might hurt sales. What other product information could be withheld to boost sales? What product misinformation could be provided to get those customers to “yes”?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    94 months ago

    Then the retailer one town over would have to have cheaper prices printed on their labels, what’s the issue?

    • @AtariDump
      link
      34 months ago

      None; just explaining the argument that retailers use.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        Gotcha. I still don’t see the reasoning behind the argument, but I’m guessing you don’t either?

        • @AtariDump
          link
          24 months ago

          I do not.

          Probably something along the lines of “it’s more work for the retailer”. Which I could see being a potential issue for smaller stores. But overall, no, I don’t get it and the price on the shelf/sign should be what I pay at the register.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            34 months ago

            If you label and ring up all your stuff by hand without some digital inventory system, yeah, that’s gonna be work.