• @TheGrandNagus
    link
    English
    233
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    A significant portion of this blog post is complaining about Mozilla’s repeated attempts to find new revenue streams that aren’t Firefox (i.e Google or Microsoft paying them to be the default search provider). It’s a sentiment I see a lot and I just don’t get it.

    They say Google paying to be the default search provider being a bad thing and it makes Mozilla too reliant on an evil company, and yet when Mozilla says “yeah, we hear ya, that’s why we’re trying to find stuff to diversify into so we can become less reliant on Google” people cry and shout “you should be sticking to Firefox, why aren’t you focussing on Firefox??”

    Like, which is it? Do you want Mozilla to diversify and have a more sustainable revenue stream, or do you want them to focus on Firefox and commit to reliance on Google? Because maintaining a project as big as Firefox without any funding simply isn’t possible, and people aren’t going back to paying for web browsers.

    What these people want is not at all realistic. Devs want to be paid for their work. They can’t have that if Mozilla follows idiots like Lunduke’s “don’t take money from Google, but also don’t do anything that will make money. Only do Firefox.”

    I’ve yet to see a single one of these people offer any alternative that comes even remotely close to being feasible.

    • m-p{3}
      link
      fedilink
      English
      84
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’m okay with Mozilla trying to diversify their source of incomes, as long as it’s focused on privacy. Firefox Relay is a great example of a paid service that helps preserving some privacy and I gladly pay for it.

      I hope they’ll make more privacy-focused optional services like that. If it helps paying for Firefox continued development while detaching from Google then it’s a good idea.

      • 𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒏
        link
        fedilink
        English
        159 months ago

        They’ve got some pretty interesting stuff in the pipeline, like container tabs optionally being hooked up to their own independent Mozilla VPN connection.

        IMO I think they’re going to go all in eventually offering a kind of “privacy ecosystem” similar to Proton

    • @sailingbythelee
      link
      English
      339 months ago

      Good comment. I like the fact that Mozilla is branching out into Relay and VPN as subscription services. I’ve got to pay someone for VPN, after all, and email masking looks interesting. If the revenue from those kinds of useful subscriptions helps to sustain Firefox and it’s derivatives, so much the better.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      139 months ago

      Like, which is it? Do you want Mozilla to diversify and have a more sustainable revenue stream, or do you want them to focus on Firefox

      Presumably these are different people.

      • @TheGrandNagus
        link
        English
        149 months ago

        That’s the thing. They aren’t different people. Just people with unrealistic expectations.

          • @TheGrandNagus
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            It’s the only criticism that matters. Yeah, I’m irked by the CEO making millions too, but that’s unfortunately the standard for pretty much any widely known company.

            Shit, Mozilla is actually on the low end in that space. So while I don’t like the egregiously high pay, it seems weird to call Mozilla out on it specifically.

            And Mozilla having layoffs a while back doesn’t change the fact that their workers need to be paid, so the “get rid of Google’s funding and stop trying to look for other income too!!! Just focus on Firefox!!” is still the dumbest take on planet Earth.

            But I’m not surprised, it’s a take from Lunduke, after all. A person who has also advised that people shouldn’t use Firefox because it’s “woke”.

    • @grue
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • @TheGrandNagus
        link
        English
        12
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Of course they spend it on more than just Firefox. What part of “we’re trying to diversify” don’t you understand?

        And I’m sorry, Lunduke is not a trustable source. He went seriously off the deep end years ago.

        From a great Linux content creator to a crazed Qanon, COVID conspiracy anti-vaxx nut trying to pedal all kinds of nonsense, who loves to shit on LGBT Linux devs. I really don’t know what the hell happened to him.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -1
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It is hard to draw conclusions without knowing much facts. How much is needed and how much is got.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1099 months ago

    How do rambling blog articles full of terrible assumptions and analysis like this get posted? Is there an alternative technology community I could sub to that cares about quality content?

    • @EatYouWell
      link
      English
      349 months ago

      Amen. It would be nice to have posts on actual technology instead of business/financial news about technology companies, or what shitty CEOs are doing in their personal lives.

    • @LifeInOregon
      link
      English
      279 months ago

      This is why I block users who share garbage after the first few times I notice it. For example, this will be the last post I see from OP.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    449 months ago

    Firefox Marketshare nosedives

    That can’t be true, literally everyone on the Fediverse uses Firefox.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      259 months ago

      This is for the year 2022. The reddit migration was 2023.

      Also the fediverse is less than 0.1% of social media market share.

      • @stooovie
        link
        English
        -259 months ago

        There was also no reddit migration.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            09 months ago

            I “go look over there” all the time via the Stealth app and see no obvious “bots or trolls”.

            Reddit’s activity took a small dip for a while but just as Spaz predicted, people forgot about it after a couple weeks and traffic went pretty much went right back to normal.

            This is why corporations will continue to step on us; because we allow it. Over and over again.

        • TheMurphy
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          Guess I don’t exist.

          • @stooovie
            link
            English
            19 months ago

            You and I and everyone on Lemm are a rounding error.

    • @EatYouWell
      link
      English
      89 months ago

      The fediverse is not anywhere near large enough to stabilize those numbers.

      • @Gigan
        link
        English
        229 months ago

        I think they were being sarcastic.

        • @EatYouWell
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          Fair enough. I wasn’t sure since people had the mindset that the number of users moving to Lemmy were enough to take down reddit.

  • @psychothumbs
    link
    English
    33
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    This is the real problem with these Silicon Valley fads like crypto and AI - they cause idiot tech executives to disinvest in their worthwhile products in an attempt to get on the bandwagon.

    • FlumPHP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      You mean you don’t see the synergy between Firefox and an AI landing page generator? /s

  • m-p{3}
    link
    fedilink
    English
    239 months ago

    I’d like to have the same kind of bonuses when I don’t meet my KPIs

  • Dariusmiles2123
    link
    fedilink
    English
    179 months ago

    I’ll never understand how someone can get paid like that. If Mozilla was destroying the opposition, I’d get it though.

    • @monkeyslikebananas2
      link
      English
      139 months ago

      They have to pay that much to attract talent! The same talent that destroyed the other companies they worked for.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    109 months ago

    Okay, so, good news for the CEO, but terrible news for the Internet as a whole. Awesome.