Removed by mod
I didn’t hate Eternals, but I had some complaints. Mainly, I think it needed to be a series. Not enough time was given to each of the characters to grow and breathe. They’re trying to set these characters up as critical to the future of the Cosmic Universe, AND explain why they haven’t interfered before now, AND explain why they are going to suddenly abandon all of their foundational beliefs to save the Earth, AND introduce an ancient evil that nobody’s noticed until now, AND one has a severely traumatic past, another is deeply in love with the traumatized one, another is a benign mind control cult leader, another wants to be human, another lives a life of fame, another is an empath dating the Black Knight, and I haven’t even mentioned the first deaf and first gay superheroes in the MCU.
It was overly ambitious, and should have been a series. Honestly, I think they scrapped the series because they didn’t want to draw comparisons to Inhumans.
A short six part series would have given me time to care about the characters or any of it really.
Exactly, but it would need to be good. And I suppose that’s the point of the article.
Thank you. The hate for The Eternals has always seemed overblown to me. I like the characters, and the story and premise are interesting - and by that I mean the good kind of “interesting”, not the version of “interesting” that you use as an adjective when you’re trying not to hurt someone’s feelings.
I’ve watched it several times. It’s not flawless, or my favorite Marvel film, but it’s certainly better than average. It’s a nice change of pace, and for me, a welcome addition to the MCU.
Something that saddened me was that there wasn’t anyone geeking about the (sometimes subtle) hints they gave about how myths were inspired or seeded by the eternals.
My favourite, which is definitely a bit niche, is the fight Gilgamesh has in Babylon with the horned deviant outside of the city … which is a direct reference to the actual myth of Gilgamesh who fights a celestial half-bull half human creature outside of the city walls. The film doesn’t stress this at all … it’s just there … and instead of getting geeky about things other than the comics (maybe this is also part of the comics I’m not sure), that side of things was just kinda ignored…
I liked that those references weren’t explored. I think just mentioning them was enough. Explaining why they’re cool would have detracted from them.
Oh for sure. I’m talking about how people didn’t seem to register these moments or be interested in talking and geeking out about them.
Oh, I see what you mean. Yeah, they were definitely under appreciated.
This is the best analysis I’ve seen on this and couldn’t agree more. I also felt the same after The Last Jedi. I left the theater extremely happy that they were trying something different only to go online and see that so many people hated it. And the Star Wars fandom has only degraded from there. “Mutually dependent downward spiral” is a great way to put it.
I was pleased with it as well but despite trying to avoid spoilers I had heard the casino scene was a good time for piss break. I took it and that may have influenced my view.
It was never going to be a good trilogy with the lack of cohesion Disney allowed but it was interesting at the time. I haven’t watched it since release though.
Nice addition. I have the same feelings about last Jedi. And look what happened to that trilogy once they tried to appease the fans!
I completely agree with everything you said.
Interesting! I suspect it’s one of those things that’s a reasonably good divider or litmus test.
Like there are two kinds of MCU fans … those that hated Eternals and those who liked or appreciated it.
And, not to be snobby or anything … but maybe finding a way to make both types of fans happy was the key, and instead the MCU has probably tried to listen a bit too much to the haters.
It’s a metaphor for abortion and how important it is sometimes. That’s my read.
I don’t know is, that a lame take on the movie? It wasn’t an amazing movie, but it had a very interesting message I thought.
Yea maybe. I hadn’t picked up that it was intended as a massively direct metaphor, though it’s definitely there. But it was definitely touching on the whole cosmic scale cycle of life thing and how there can be hard realities you gotta sometimes face.
I mean, that’s what I took away as well.
But… Isn’t that also abortion in general?
Oh for sure.
That’s a low ass bar
And what else would he say anyway? Hey that show i wanted to do but couldn’t would’ve been so ass you wouldn’t believe it.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“It was a television version of The Eternals… but good,” Ridley recently told the Comic Book Club podcast of his planned ABC series.
“There was the version that [Marvel] ended up doing,” Ridley went on to add, referring to Chloé Zhao’s 2021 movie.
His body of work speaks to his talent, just as it did for Chloe Zhao ahead of her movie version.
But they all knew their scopes, even when they did lean more into the fantastical, they worked for the medium and scale they were telling their stories in, and played with that freedom even as their cinematic siblings kept giving them the cold shoulder.
This is, however, to knock the Marvel TV we were getting at the time (or a couple years later at least) that honestly is more closer to what Eternals would’ve had to do on ABC: Inhumans.
There is forever a chance, even though we’ll never see it, that an Eternals TV show could’ve been the “But Good” version.
The original article contains 508 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 68%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
