A former Activision executive has sued the publisher in California state court accusing the company of age discrimination and violating the state’s whistleblower protection law, as reported by Law360.

The suit was filed earlier this week by a 57-year-old former tech executive who worked for the company from 2014 until being laid off as part of a restructuring in the Activision Blizzard’s Central Tech department last August.

The lawsuit gives several examples to establish that Activision Blizzard discriminated against him, starting with statements Bobby Kotick allegedly made at a leadership conference that the “problem” with Activision Blizzard is that “there are too many old white guys.” (The suit doesn’t say exactly when the conference was.)

  • @givesomefucks
    link
    English
    6011 months ago

    It’s still bullshit that age discrimination is 100% legal until you’re 40 years old…

    But that’s what happens when the majority of people making laws are past retirement age. They don’t think anyone under 40 knows anything, so they think discriminating against them is valid.

  • @Potatos_are_not_friends
    link
    English
    -44
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Old White dude being pushed out?

    Cry me a fucking river.

    Edit: Downvoters are defending a boomer tech executive. Tech executive salaries at Activision is in the millions range. This guy is pissed he couldn’t buy a fifth house or add another payment to his boat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6911 months ago

      If the reason you’re being laid off is your skin colour or your age, no matter what color your skin is or what age your are, it’s wrong.

      (Unless you are getting fired for lying about your age and you’re actually under the legal minimum)

      • @Potatos_are_not_friends
        link
        English
        -8
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        He got laid off because he’s old AF and out of touch.

        He’s using his skin color as a excuse.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1311 months ago

          If that’s the case his ex employer will be able to prove he wasn’t competent to do the job anymore but if there’s communications that prove they did it because he’s white or he’s old and that’s the reason he got laid off, then that’s discrimination plain and simple.

      • @inb4_FoundTheVegan
        link
        English
        -3411 months ago

        Sure, but that sort of “yes black lives matter but all lives matter” doesn’t actually reflect reality. It ignores actual discrimination when we are pretending that white men are historically and presently the overwhelming majority in these fields.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s not a “whose lives matter” issue, it’s a labor rights issue. Age and skin colour aren’t valid reasons to lay off someone competent, the company will be able to prove he wasn’t able to do his job anymore if that was the issue.

          If you accept that a person gets laid off because they’re white, older or a man then you need to accept that a young black woman can get laid off for being too young, black or a woman, that’s equality.

        • Orbituary
          link
          English
          -7
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Skill is not important. Just skin color. Check.

          /s

          • @Potatos_are_not_friends
            link
            English
            -3
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Guy gets fired and is replaced with more competent people.

            This guy: “Ah I’m being oppressed because woke companies are trying to remove old white guys!”

    • @FMT99
      link
      English
      3611 months ago

      Don’t fall for their cynical attempts to divide us. They’ll try to make it about age, race or religion but it’s not. It’s about management vs workers.