A new bill in Florida would make accusations of Transphobia would be treated as defamation. The defendant could not “prove truth” by citing a plaintiff’s “scientific or religious beliefs.”


A new bill introduced in Florida, Senate Bill 1780, would make accusations of discrimination towards transgender people “defamation per se,” with accusers on the hook for a hefty $35,000 penalty. Critically, the bill states that if you are sued for defamation under the statutes, you cannot use the defendant’s scientific or religious beliefs or expression to prove that they are acting in a discriminatory fashion towards transgender people. These and other provisions would make it so that accusations of transphobic discrimination would be nearly impossible to prove, and would leave anyone making the accusation on the hook for damages.

The bill outlines several methods and protections for individuals accused of transphobic actions to sue their accusers. For example, one clause stipulates that a person cannot be deemed a public figure due to their association with “a video, image, or statement uploaded on the internet that has reached a large audience.” This implies that if someone is captured on video engaging in discriminatory behavior against transgender individuals, such as denying entry or using slurs, this viral content cannot establish their status as a “public figure.” Consequently, this makes it easier for them to initiate lawsuits against those who accuse them of transphobia, regardless of what the video shows.

Most importantly, the bill contains a section that would make allegations that someone is operating in a discriminatory fashion towards “race, sex, sexual orientation, or gender identity” defamation per se, meaning accusations of racism, sexism, homophobia, or transphobia could result in hefty lawsuits. For homophobia and transphobia, there is an additional provision that would make lawsuits much more likely to succeed: defendants could not cite a plaintiff’s “constitutionally protected religious expression or beliefs” or a plaintiff’s “scientific beliefs” to prove the truth of their allegation of homophobia or transphobia.

read more: https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/florida-bill-would-make-accusations?publication_id=994764&post_id=140479556

  • @xantoxis
    link
    11110 months ago

    Your ideology must be going great if you need laws to punish people just for observing that it exists.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 months ago

      They complain about “leftist snowflakes”, then go and try to pass legislation like this.

    • @unreasonabro
      link
      010 months ago

      it’s just that they’re using the wrong words to describe it. Facts don’t win arguments, Karens do. Right?

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4910 months ago

    So basically a “you can’t sue or I’m rubber and your glue” bill to go with the “don’t say gay bill”. Imagine needing to put this much time into bills like this because you can’t stop your hate from getting you in trouble and you would rather attack marginalized groups than do any actual governing.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        810 months ago

        Seriously tho wtf are they doing

        Building a dictatorship, obviously.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      Imagine putting time into bills like this instead of solving Florida’s insurance crisis.

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4510 months ago

    Defamation is so difficult to convict on in the US because of 1st amendment protections. This new statute is DOA once a non-shitass court looks at it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1410 months ago

      Yup. Defamation case law has set an incredibly high bar in the United States. There’s no way this is going to stand up in court, assuming it even passes.

      • @chuckleslord
        link
        1110 months ago

        The chilling effect it would have on speech in the meantime is the whole point.

        • ditty
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          And it’s just a waste of time so Florida politicians can do performative posturing for their base instead of actual governing. More of the same

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          IDK, how many people actually pay attention to the nonsense being passed in their state legislature? I’m guessing most people in Florida aren’t aware this even exists. This is only really going to apply to public figures.

  • It's Maddie!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Just fucking nuke that entire shithole state to molten slag already

  • Jessica
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1910 months ago

    Jason Brodeur Is a transphobe. My friend told me that Jason Brodeur is the one who shits on the toilet seats of public restrooms. Anyways, Jason Brodeur once tried to kiss me on the way home from school. So he is totally gay now, and also shits on toilet seats, like a poorly trained dog. How much is 35,000 Floridian Meth Money in USD?

  • A Phlaming Phoenix
    link
    fedilink
    1210 months ago

    Thought these guys were big on free speech. This sounds like abridging expression to me.

    Don’t we already have crimes like slander and libel that cover when people do this and it’s not true? Thus, this law would widen that to include saying it when it is true?

  • @bfg9k
    link
    710 months ago

    They’re evolving, just backwards

  • @Okokimup
    link
    610 months ago

    He looks like he’s saying “Hans, are we ze baddies?”

    • @unreasonabro
      link
      1
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Has david mitchell ever actually tried a different accent? I imagine it’d be hilarious. I haven’t seen the show and know him only from the uk comedy circuit.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    410 months ago

    this works in the inverse, ‘i fired you because my religious beliefs from my one-man religion say i have to’