Republican-led state legislatures are considering a new round of bills restricting medical care for transgender youths — and in some cases, adults — returning to the issue the year after a wave of high-profile bills became law and sparked lawsuits.

As legislatures begin their work for the year, lawmakers in several states have proposed enacting or strengthening restrictions on puberty-blocking drugs and hormone treatments for minors. Bills to govern which pronouns kids can use at school, which sports teams students can play on, and which bathroom they can use are back, as well, along with efforts to restrict drag performances and some books and school curriculums.

LGBTQ+ advocates say that most of the states inclined to pass bans on gender-affirming care have done so, and that they now expect them to build on those restrictions and expand them to include adults. With legislatures in most states up for election this year, transgender youths and their families worry about again being targeted by conservatives using them as a wedge issue.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    238 months ago

    Oh, but they told us it was just about kids! Because gender affirming care is child abuse, right? And Republicans are against Big Government interfering in people’s lives, aren’t they? Hmmm… it’s almost as if they threw logic out the window a few decades back or something, isn’t it?

  • toomanypancakes
    link
    English
    228 months ago

    I’m so tired. These ghouls want us all gone and they aren’t going to stop.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I don’t understand the outrage. We hardly receive healthcare at all if you’re not rich.

    Sometimes I wonder if this is being used as a distraction from actual healthcare reform. Your insurance dollars are lining pockets, not paying for care.

    It allows them to pretend that they’re interested in reforming the system that’s working as designed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      138 months ago

      You don’t understand the outrage over Republicans’ efforts to single out and oppress a segment of the population they clearly want to eliminate entirely?

  • @Ensign_Crab
    link
    English
    108 months ago

    Coulda protected trans people with national legislation, but preserving the Jim Crow Filibuster was more important.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    77 months ago

    This can’t be true, conservatives assured me that this was only about children.

    Next you’ll tell me that they are trying to ban books for adults as well!

  • andrew_bidlaw
    link
    fedilink
    58 months ago

    So much silly words. LGBTQ+ advocates say blah-blah-blah because personal freedom blah-blah-blah and the right to blah-blah-blah.

    I feel the blue candidate that wouldn’t dance around and explain, reference studies, etc, but just smash them by so what’s your exact problem? and why are you so hurt about it? would inspire much more voters.

    Republicans like harsh replies? Dems can play that game too. Maybe even make them feel like cowards for not accepting this and that.

    I’m not a political technologist. I’m just guessing what it would be to call an average red-state person a pussy for fearing imaginary bullshit. How much in broken bones?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      97 months ago

      Having been involved in entirely too many of these hearings, we’re not really appealing to the GOP legislators but to the general public. There is no magic set of words I’m going to say that’s going to convince the folks that are hanging out with the Family Policy Alliance team that drafted the bill. If I go in there and tell them my unvarnished opinion, I get my mic cut and removed, and the folks pushing the bill have an immediate example of an “unhinged” trans person.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    As legislatures begin their work for the year, lawmakers in several states have proposed enacting or strengthening restrictions on puberty-blocking drugs and hormone treatments for minors.

    “They’ll stop at nothing, so we don’t know what exactly to anticipate (in 2024),” said Katy Erker-Lynch, executive director of PROMO, an advocacy group in Missouri, where lawmakers have proposed more than 20 bills targeting LGBTQ+ people.

    Bills filed in Missouri include efforts to remove two provisions that were key in overcoming a Democratic filibuster to that state’s ban on gender-affirming care for youths.

    The new Missouri Freedom Caucus is prioritizing a bill that would make the ban on gender-affirming care for minors permanent, removing a provision that allows it to expire in 2027.

    “We passed what I thought was a strong and fairly broad bill last year,” said Missouri Senate President Pro Tem Caleb Rowden, referring to the medical ban.

    Legislation introduced Wednesday in West Virginia would ban gender-affirming care up to age 21 and prohibit mental health professionals from supporting what lawmakers call a transgender patient’s “delusion” about their gender identity.


    The original article contains 1,289 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 86%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I swear, if not for Illinois, poss Michigan, anything not bordering an ocean would be a flyover state.

    Edit: Well, even then, quite a lot of both IL and MI would still be flyover country.