• @shalafi
    link
    English
    3010 months ago

    If we drop all political considerations, indiscriminately fucking with international trade routes is sure to get your ass kicked. Right or wrong don’t matter. Call it terrorism or piracy or whatever you like, it ain’t gonna fly.

    • @eskimofry
      link
      English
      110 months ago

      Except you can’t drop all political considerations and you sure as hell can’t call this trade route debacle indiscriminate fucking. They specifically attacked this route because they suspect it supplies israel too.

  • @RapidcreekOP
    link
    English
    2310 months ago

    Guess they should have stopped firing missles at our ships.

    • PugJesus
      link
      fedilink
      2810 months ago

      I mean who is gonna stop him?

      From retributive action against terrorists performing unprovoked attacks against civilian ships of numerous countries in international waters?

      No one, probably?

      • @TropicalDingdong
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        There’s a broader point here that everyone seems to be missing, which is that the role of president didn’t have the authority to do things like this historically. It’s not about it being R or D, or if it’s moral and justified ‘this time’. It’s that we’ve ceded a power to the executive which should be in the legislative branch.

        I would really ask you to listen/ watch the debate I posted.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        -1910 months ago

        I hate when people say things like this like genocide is apparently not enough provocation.

        • PugJesus
          link
          fedilink
          16
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Yeah, I’m sure those non-Israeli civilian ships not even heading to Israel are really provoking the Houthis with their genocidal actions.

            • PugJesus
              link
              fedilink
              1310 months ago

              Yes. Do you understand the idea of a ‘neutral nation’ or ‘international waters’?

              • NoneOfUrBusiness
                link
                fedilink
                -1510 months ago

                Yemen explicitly rejected neutrality. That’s well within their rights when a genocide is happening at their doorstep.

                • PugJesus
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1510 months ago

                  You do understand that these ships being attacked are ships of neutral nations, right?

                  You do understand that… right?

                  And that the attacks aren’t happening in Yemeni territorial waters or Israeli territorial waters, but in international waters.

                  You realize that… right?

                  … right…?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          2 wrongs don’t make a right. Uninvolved civilians just working a shift don’t deserve to die

    • @fastandcurious
      link
      English
      -910 months ago

      People can cry all they want, but it’s the US who gave the excuse to Houthi, I think they should first stop their genocide before accusing others of terrorism, leave that to more respectful countries