Wow, did I misread that. At first I thought “international strikes” referred to union activity, and the tech firms were going to attack the strikers with drones!
You are correct, just ten years too early.
I thought unions were gonna strike the tech companies w drones.
I’m quite disappointed thats not the theme of this article, and my evening is ruined.
I thought it was saying that the actual tech companies were preparing to get attacked by the drones.
It’s not?
I read it like 7 times and I still have no idea what it means. Lmao
I don’t think that was an accident. It’ll get a lot more clicks with that interpretation.
they cab just ***** people no need for expensive reaserch
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Now, dozens of tech companies are working on systems to thwart possible drone attacks, including within the U.S., where civilian sites might potentially be targeted, according to academics and industry analysts.
Last summer, in what Jacob called a first-of-its-kind event, about a dozen companies were invited to demonstrate and test their drone-defense products at a dedicated facility just east of Oklahoma State’s campus in Stillwater.
The Biden administration has encouraged the push in the anti-drone sector in multiple ways, issuing a call last year for universities, private companies and other researchers to come up with fresh ideas to address the threat.
“The unauthorized use of drones (whether malicious or otherwise) presents a significant and rising threat to all large gatherings of people, including major sporting events,” the NFL, MLB, NCAA and NASCAR said in a joint letter to Congress last year.
And in 2015, a small drone crashed on the White House lawn after a federal employee who was operating it several blocks away lost control of the device, causing a temporary lockdown.
But there would also be downsides to putting drone defense systems at every sports stadium, concert venue, government building, power station and other sensitive sites, experts said.
The original article contains 1,841 words, the summary contains 199 words. Saved 89%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
i dont think its realistic to have reliable anti drone defenses.
i fly an fpv drone (the kind used by ukraine), but for fun and without explosives, and they are so small and manuverable that it doesnt seem super doable to hit them with a net or whatever. jamming would work, but they can just use a different frequency, and gps spoofing is only a problem for autonomous drones.
i dont know enough about lasers to judge them, so maybe thatd work, but as an example of how extreme drones can get, there was a guy who built a little quadcopter that flew up to 40,000ft. its a hard problem
https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/weapons/a45500360/army-first-laser-unit/
Or maybe not. Military has been doing laser drone stuff for 20 years. Also this thing shoots down artillery, good luck getting a quadcopter past it.
wow, didnt know about that. i still think its a hard problem, i mean artillery rounds dont fly a few feet off the ground and manuever, but if anything could defend against drones it’d be that.
