Dunno what happened with that other user’s post, but I figured I’d post the correct article for them. Not really the sort of article I’d usually post or even read.

  • k-rad
    link
    1910 months ago

    Shouldn’t be any royalty in 2024

  • @quitenormal
    link
    210 months ago

    I’m just wondering if we could substitute our current monarchy for the Danish one. Maybe if a Danish naval officer lands at Sydney Cove and plants a flag there? This has a precedent I believe.

    • ZagorathOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 months ago

      I was only somewhat joking when, a week or so ago, I suggested that that switching to the Danish monarchy could be a compromise between republicans and monarchists.

      • @quitenormal
        link
        210 months ago

        Looks like we have a movement then. Only small, so far, but …

      • Quokka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Nah only compromise I’ll accept is them peacefully stepping down.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          There’s something to be said for an overall “boss” to the Government. Someone with no real power day-to-day, but with the power to sack the government and force us to an election. Critically: someone outside our politics.

          The one time the power was invoked, it was done terribly by a Governor General worried over his own job and for local political reasons.

          If we disconnect from the monarchy, I would want that position to be retained by someone. But who? The queen king fills this role fairly well at the moment.

          • Quokka
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            There’s nothing to be said about democracy being subverted.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              Even The Dismissal was not a subversion of democracy. It was a dissolution of parliment and an invocation of democracy: taking us to an election. I was a little kid, so obviously wasn’t involved in the politics at the time. My dad was a die-hard Labor voter and he was furious. So, my personal memories of it are very anti-Fraser/Kerr as a result of that influence in my formative years.

              But for all of that, I concede that the Government needs to be accountable to someone. I believe we need an “emergency stop” button in our constitutional makeup. I just don’t think the one time it was used was a valid emergency. I think history has the same conclusion - that was not the way the power should be invoked. I doubt it’ll happen again like that.

              • Quokka
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                An unelected person or persons, being given control over government is not democratic.

                The government, if it has to exist, needs only to be accountable to the citizens it exists to serves.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  110 months ago

                  Well, if it’s baked into our constitution, the implementation of such a role is created by a democratic process. So, while the individual may not be directly elected, we (or our ancestors in our case) did vote the position into existence. I wouldn’t be against this person being elected directly under some future constitution, though I have concerns how they could maintain their distance from our politics if that were the case. That is a question I’d want adressed.

                  Conversely, a government without such a role leads to what our friends in the USA have. A system that gets bogged down in stupid politics so badly that they literally shut down their whole government every few years over their political in-fighting. They don’t have anyone to force them to behave. I wouldn’t want that.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Given the crown has a policy of interfering with neither the decisions nor appointment of the Governor General, we could become a Republic without changing the practical power at all.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    As Denmark prepares to welcome a new king and queen to the throne, an unassuming pub on the opposite side of the globe is celebrating its role in the ascension of the world’s first Australian-born monarch.

    Frederik, the Crown Prince of Denmark, first met the Tasmanian real estate manager Mary Donaldson nearly 24 years ago at Sydney’s Slip Inn while the city was swept up in Olympic fever, though the pub is a little different these days.

    On Saturday, after picking up their wedding rings in the city, soon-to-be-married couple Adam Knight and Sharon Atherton chose to wander down to the harbourside pub best known for the modern-day fairytale.

    The venue has a special menu item in honour of Frederik – the “El Frederiko Hot Dog” – a nod to Danish hotdog culture still in keeping with the Spanish language.

    Birgitte Maibom, the chief executive of the Danish Church Australia, says while most people are sad to see Queen Margaret abdicate, they are excited to celebrate the couple.

    The Australian government announced on Saturday it would make a contribution to Wildcare Tasmania to support the conservation of the Tasmanian devil, which is only found in the wild on the island state where Mary grew up.


    The original article contains 673 words, the summary contains 205 words. Saved 70%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Cosmoooooooo
    link
    English
    -110 months ago

    Nooooo, Australians are supposed to suck on Charlie’s nipples!

    Hahahaah. Screw monarchs.