DAVOS, Switzerland (AP) — The world could have its first trillionaire within a decade, anti-poverty organization Oxfam International said Monday in its annual assessment of global inequalities timed to the gathering of political and business elites at the Swiss ski resort of Davos.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The idea that one person could generate enough benefit to mankind in a year that they have fairly earned a billion dollars is ludicrous. The existence of billionaires is self-evident proof that the system is broken. It’s impossible for one person to have that through means other than denying other people their fair share.

    That being the case, no one under the age of 1000 at least should ever be worth a trillion dollars.

    • @smokin_shinobi
      link
      2410 months ago

      We should dip the first one in gold and put him on display as a warning.

  • @AllonzeeLV
    link
    49
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Yes, the problem of wealth concentration is going unaddressed and getting worse.

    The few with more than they need to live large for a thousand lifetimes using their ill gotten, exploitation derived wealth to exploit more wealth while contributing no labor to the society they extract value from without any consideration, let alone any appreciation for the society that provided the conditions for their great wealth in the first place. In essence, our oligarchs are fracking human civilization, for nothing more than ego.

    This is what happens when you pretend a problem isn’t a problem, and is in fact our purpose in life. In a crisis, the US’s first declaration is that “we must protect our beloved society economic system of systematic exploitation.” where else would such a road lead?

    https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-ownership-wealthiest-americans-one-percent-record-high-economy-2024-1

  • Bappity
    link
    English
    2410 months ago

    humanity is a failure of a species

  • @hark
    link
    2110 months ago

    Surely they’ll have had enough then, right?

  • Chemical Wonka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1810 months ago

    I would say that if nature collapsed earlier this would be stopped but these parasites will profit from that too.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1610 months ago

    The problem with eating the rich is all the crazy drugs they take makes their meat rancid. Zuck however is probably the tastiest due to is wagyu diet and exercise routine.

    • @robocallOP
      link
      English
      1110 months ago

      I hear lizard tastes like chicken

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      410 months ago

      That man is absolutely brimming with steroids and neurotropics.

  • k-rad
    link
    1610 months ago

    Once you get to a billion you should get a free ticket to the sun

    • ALQ
      link
      810 months ago

      Why waste the resources sending perfectly good stew meat into the sun?

      Worst case scenario, they feed the pigs.

  • @eran_morad
    link
    13
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Same as it ever was. First of all, we’re talking basically about infinite money, past a certain number it transitions into a qualitative regime. Several people have had that over the course of human history. Most of them were fucking murderous douchecunts. History shows that they either pass their power to other douchecunts, with the chain broken by incompetence over many generations and at the cost of countless lives, or they meet a violent end — choose your own adventure. Shout out to the very few who have given away their fortunes in their lifetimes.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      710 months ago

      It might as well be infinite money right now. All of these billionaires have more money than they can spend in their lifetimes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1210 months ago

    Thats their take???

    The numbers are as follows:

    The 1% own 43% off all wealth.

    The 5 richest men raised their wealth by 114% in three years.

    To offset the difference in rate increase between total 1% and top 5 aswell as the total amount of wealth also increasing with innovation we will pretend this number is a stable 100% increase every 3 years while we actually expect that rate to increase exponentially.

    That means in 3 years the 1% will have 86% of all wealth.

    If we dont solve wealth equality before 2030 more than 99% of the world will have to share less then 1% of existing wealth. By that time i believe no economy can sustain. People will be better of growing food in their garden and trading with their neighbous.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      People will be better of growing food in their garden and trading with their neighbours.

      Which the gov’t will then start taxing because the top 1% will not be taxed at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        What government? And taxes using what valuta?

        When we get close to the 1% owning 99% of wealth i (which we cant know if it really will happen but it can be within 5 years based on oxfams recent numbers) People will have nothing left to pay with, employers and governments besides the 10 “winner” megacorps no institution will have money to afford staff.

        There might be still some form employment as part of the corpos private army which may pretend to be a government but i highly doubt people will have to worry about giving up a % of their crops more like there land and lives.

        I recognize i am sketching a very pessimistic picture here. I want to note i am equal optimist and pessimist. Maybe before that time the signals will be clear enough for a global wealth tax an ubi. I see many ways for the world to become great or horrible and feel like its important to get a grasp of all possibilities, even the extreme ones. The only thing i can truly say for certain is that change is inevitable.

        As a kid i was often told “no one person can change the world” but no one person can stop change from happening either.

    • @june
      link
      English
      210 months ago

      You get annual raises?

  • @paddirn
    link
    English
    910 months ago

    We shouldn’t even have billionaires, let alone trillionaires. That much wealth concentrated in any one person’s hands is means that somebody somewhere is getting fleeced, whether it’s workers or consumers, something isn’t being distributed fairly.