On the last Saturday before Donald Trump took office, in January 2017, I watched the controlled chaos of a hackathon unfold in a library at the University of Pennsylvania. Volunteer archivists, librarians, and computer scientists were trawling government websites, looking for data sets about climate change to duplicate for safekeeping. Groups like this were meeting across the country. Flowcharts on whiteboards laid out this particular room’s priorities: copy decades of ice-core statistics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration; scrape the Environmental Protection Agency’s entire library of local air-monitoring results from the previous four years; find a way to preserve a zoomable map of the factories and power plants emitting the most greenhouse gases.

The fear was that the incoming administration would pull information like this from public view—and within a week, it did. By noon on Inauguration Day, the Trump administration had scrubbed mentions of climate change from the White House website. By May, officials had taken down the EPA’s page laying out climate science for the general public, as well as 108 pages associated with the Clean Power Plan, the landmark Obama policy meant to curb emissions from power plants—months before the Trump administration tried to repeal the policy altogether.

The administration’s goal was to bury the issue of climate change. Nothing was done to address it; the very mention of it was knocked from the national agenda—and, by extension, the international agenda. If Trump returns to office, he will surely double down on this strategy.

Non-paywall link

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    5311 months ago

    It’s not “ignore it”, it’s actively make it worse. Look at all of his coal bullshit. There’s no economic reason to continue supporting coal

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2311 months ago

      Came here to say this. He actively sold off public lands that were held in reserve for the future - it was OURS, now it just managed to line HIS pockets. Remind me again btw why I am supposed to be afraid of “socialism”, but capitalism = perfection? :-(

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    3311 months ago

    I have no patience with people who “just cant find it in their heart to support Biden again”. There is too fucking much at stake to hold Biden to these impossible standards.

    • katy ✨
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      especially when biden is one of the most progressive presidents in modern history

    • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
      link
      English
      -611 months ago

      They’ll come around once presented with a choice. Lecturing people isn’t a good GOTV strategy. You’re better off listening and being friendly.

        • Doc Avid Mornington
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Fuck being friendly.

          Maybe this’ll teach them

          You can decide for yourself, of course, whether being friendly and listening is more or less effective than lecturing, but it sounds like you’re choosing not to pick the best of bad options, but just let it burn, to show people who think differently from you how wrong they are. This could be described as:

          threatening to take the ball and go home

            • Doc Avid Mornington
              link
              fedilink
              English
              011 months ago

              I get it. I’m frustrated, too. I’ve tried so many times, too. If you think that somebody can’t be swayed, then it’s probably best not to waste time on them at all, but think about the other people - the ones watching the conversation play out, who may never say a word - what will move them? Sometimes, I do think being confrontational and telling someone off can be the best option, because other people are watching, and it’s what they see that matters. Other times, for the same reason, it’s not a good choice. And sometimes I just get mad and I say what I say, even though it might be doing more harm than good. And still other times, I don’t say anything at all, because I don’t know how to say something useful. It sucks. Giving a shit really sucks sometimes.

              I try to remember how Hillary Clinton said “basket of deplorables”, absolute political malpractice, that was. When you give someone a choice between thinking of themselves as being bad, and thinking of you as being wrong, they’ll always make the same decision.

  • chknbwl
    link
    1611 months ago

    This dude, in the same breath as claiming to be a dictator “on day one”, said his main priority is to drill, baby, drill. He, along with all of his voters, have openly opted to make the climate crisis worse. Simply put, republicans are Eco-terrorists. The world, not just the US, cannot afford to have Republicans in charge anymore.

  • @Sterile_Technique
    link
    English
    1511 months ago

    Trump’s approach is to pour gasoline into the dumpster fire. Ignoring it is almost everyone else’s approach.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      13
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yeah, the climate can’t afford another full 365 days of our current carbon output. Like, in reality, it can’t do one more day. It couldn’t have done about the last five decades. But it’s doing it because we won’t stop. It’s likely already too late. But the world does have insane healing properties. Maybe if we stopped, it could heal itself.

      But this “slow down a little by 2050” bullshit is just poppycock.

      #GuysCanWeLikeChillOutABitOnTheClimate

  • Philo
    link
    fedilink
    911 months ago

    The presidency can’t afford another Trump presidency.

  • @cmbabul
    link
    6
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It couldnt afford the first one

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    511 months ago

    his approach isn’t to ignore it; it’s to actively make it worse

  • @WoahWoah
    link
    011 months ago

    Because roughly 60% of likely voters think climate change is a “false religion” that has nothing to do with the climate.

    Think about that. Why would a republican candidate that is only about themselves ever do anything about climate change? They poll better when they do the opposite.

    We have to be careful here, because we’re getting dangerously close to denial about the popularity of climate change denial. We’re not winning, and even though it’s an existential crisis, “Well you’ll see I’m right when the world is on fire” actually makes people LESS likely to support efforts to fight climate change. Think about that too.