• CaptainBasculin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3110 months ago

    If it wasn’t huge; studios wouldn’t drop millions for their animations; numbers from 4000 people doesn’t mean shit.

    • @Kuinox
      link
      English
      9
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      4000 random people does mean something, you can extrapolate the data with it, it’s the whole point of surveys. Of course, the numbers won’t be very accurate, but it gives a good approximate.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        You’re assuming that the set of people surveyed was truly random, but it never is—people who don’t like answering surveys are always underrepresented (obviously), and the article isn’t specific about how people were recruited for this one. There isn’t enough information to tell how much skew might have been introduced as a result. Surveys are always kind of iffy as information sources: not meaningless, but with a lot of subtle noise in the signal.

        • @Kuinox
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          The skew is something they take in account. They have models to take this into account.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 months ago

            The skew is something they’re supposed to take into account, if they realize a given factor is important. Models are seldom perfect, and people can be incompetent or self-centered even when they’re not being actively malicious. I think you’re overestimating both the quality of the statistical models and the purity of the motives behind this survey.

            • @Kuinox
              link
              English
              110 months ago

              I already said I couldn’t judge it since they didn’t published any report.

      • @SatouKazuma
        link
        English
        210 months ago

        Does it though? I’d think you’d probably want at a minimum, n = 100,000 to have any sort of representative sample. I don’t think it’s a stretch to surmise that there are at least, what…a hundred million anime fans in one capacity or another, worldwide? Anything much less than 0.1% of the actual population is susceptible to some major deviation from population-wide statistics.

          • @SatouKazuma
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            The problem is that this assumes a perfectly normal distribution. There’s a possibility that anime fandom likely doesn’t follow a Gaussian distribution (dare I say it’s almost certainly not Gaussian, because anecdotally, people seem to either be neck deep into it, or are disgusted by it, with nary anything in between). If this is true, the above calculator doesn’t exactly work.

            • @Scholars_Mate
              link
              English
              410 months ago

              Normal distribution with regards to what? “Do you watch anime weekly” is a binary question. There really isn’t a distribution associated with that.

              • @SatouKazuma
                link
                English
                210 months ago

                Wouldn’t that be a binomial distribution then?

                • @Scholars_Mate
                  link
                  English
                  110 months ago

                  It’s been a while since I took statistics, but yes, I guess that is a binomial distribution. It does not influence the results in the way you are implying it does, though. The calculator does actually account for it (the Population Proportion input), and the sample size actually decreases the lower/higher your proportion is. My point was that a question like, “Do you watch anime weekly,” is not like a question like, “How many hours of anime do you watch in a week,” where you certainly couldn’t assume a normal distribution for the number of hours watched.

        • @Kuinox
          link
          English
          210 months ago

          Don’t worry, survey models in competent surveys company are made by peoples competent in statistics.
          The number of people needed to survey is something you can calculate.
          FYI I dont know the reputation of americans survey companies, nor found a survey report, so we can’t really judge this except saying the articles should share the survey report

          • @SatouKazuma
            link
            English
            110 months ago

            I mean, I would hope that a company that exists to survey people would be competent in said field. But as someone who has a diploma in maths, I’ll say that I do think four thousand people simply isn’t enough.

    • Altima NEO
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      And anime has been huge since the 80s. It’s only been getting bigger.

  • @Fribbtastic
    link
    English
    610 months ago

    Polygon surveyed more than 4,000 people

    That isn’t that many people. This is like 0.04% of the people subscribed to the r/anime subreddit. and just 2.5% of the number of visitors of an anime convention in my country.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    610 months ago

    44% of anime fans — and 58% of Gen Z fans — say they have had a crush on an anime character at some point.

    Anime was a mistake and shall be destroyed. I’m creating the AntiAnime movement

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    Every time someone tries to explain to me why they don’t watch animation, I hear “I don’t like green, so I don’t read books with green covers”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    29 months ago

    I kinda would love to know the populairity of anime for non American /english countrys.

    For exemple in the netherlands. Anime is almost inposible to stream legaly. If you want to see things for the current season