• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    93
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    It was me. Reinstalled three times a couple days ago because I’m an idiot.

    But I’m an idiot who uses FOSS and I rather be dumb in a world of genius than a genius in a world of dumb.

  • @TheGrandNagus
    link
    35
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    'ate dependency hell

    'ate outdated packages in distro repos

    'ate snaps

    luv flathub

    simple as

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    318 months ago

    I like how know one wants snap but everyone chose flatpak.

    I like flatpaks

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            I’ve never had problems with appimage, and for me, containers are for my servers. I don’t want stateless, sandboxed applications for my workstations.

            In what ways is it broken?

            • Possibly linux
              link
              fedilink
              English
              18 months ago

              Containers don’t need to be stateless. I use Distrobox to create environments that I run my software in. Podman is the best for Distrobox but it can use the docker backend as well.

  • Po Tay Toes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    168 months ago

    I’m an average Flathub enjoyer, there because Canonical try to force me to use o’Snap.

  • Chewy
    link
    fedilink
    158 months ago

    The issue with those numbers is that they don’t account for people having multiple devices. My PC, Laptop, and Steam Deck all download apps from flathub, so I’m likely counted multiple times. On the other hand most people only use one device, so the actual numbers probably don’t doffer much. It’s an estimate anyway.

    Edit: I’m not surprised the amount of people using flatpak/flathub increased so much. It’s my preferred method of installing proprietary software and works on any distro, even unconventional ones like NixOS or Alpine. Sandboxing continues to get better, be it isolation or usability.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    158 months ago

    I know there’s abit of a war going on about the technical merits of flatpaks which I don’t know enough about the Unix world to fully understand.

    As a newer user flatpaks have been pretty great, I like having the Android like permissions system through flatseal especially for my proprietary apps like Discord.

    I dunno if I’d go all in on using only flatpaks but for what it is, consider me a fan.

  • @ObsidianZed
    link
    118 months ago

    As a noob, can someone briefly explain flatpaks and why they may be preferred?

    • haui
      link
      fedilink
      278 months ago

      Glad you asked

      • containerized apps
      • more secure than regular install
      • less clutter
      • no dependency hell
      • open source (in opposition to snap)
      • @warmaster
        link
        11
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Containerization is not mandatory, some flatpaks are not air-gapped at all which is a real bummer. I wish they all were.

      • @ObsidianZed
        link
        38 months ago

        That was my guess, from others’ context. Hits almost all of the good points.

        How containerized though? Could it be a replacement for a docker server “farm” on a single machine or is it know for apps to simply use locally?

        • haui
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Good question. Docker can be used for orchestration which I‘m pretty sure is a lot more than flatpak is designed for. So if this interests you (I‘m fine with docker) feel free to try it out and update me.

  • downhomechunk [chicago]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    108 months ago

    I am not one of the million, but I’m glad flatpaks exist. Anything to increase ease of use and hopefully wider linux adoption is a good thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      98 months ago

      You mean GitHub signin?

      Because Flathub operates on GitHub. If you hate it that much, you could use a different Flatpak distributor (I heard Fedora has its own?)

  • Aniki 🌱🌿
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    By choice or by force? I’ll take flatpaks over Appimages and literally rocks over snaps, but what is this metric actually saying?

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      138 months ago

      It is saying that more than one million people are actively using Flathub. What do you mean by force?

      • Aniki 🌱🌿
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Well if there’s an application that the developer only releases a flatpak for, do I have a choice in being one of those million if there’s no easy way to compile it myself? What if I’m a newbie linuxer and cannot get all the dev tools installed?

        • Chewy
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          What do you currently do if a developer doesn’t package their software for other distros? Maybe they only provide an AUR package or a .deb, so someone else has to package it.

          With flatpak the only difference is that a distro independent package exists, that anyone can install. It being possible to do cross-distro apps with a single package doesn’t make it any harder for distros to also package it.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            I’m not arguing against flatpaks I’m just calling the number suspect to meaningless as a metric.

            • Chewy
              link
              fedilink
              18 months ago

              Thanks, I think I understand now what you mean. I still disagree on the notion that people are forced to use flatpak and that the number is meaningless because of that. People choose to use flatpak because it solves their problem.

              I’d say it’s similar to many people who use Ubuntu because of its big user base and software support. It’s still an achievement to be recognized.

              Anyway, I do agree that the number itself isn’t really relevant. I’m pretty tired and maybe I’m a bit pedantic, so good night (or have a nice day, depending on your timezone).

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          There are no cases of this that I know of. There are some developers that don’t encourage repackaging their apps, though.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          what’s your point? if flatpak makes it easier for developers to package their software and easier for users to install it, there’s nothing wrong with it being famous

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      08 months ago

      I don’t think there’s any business entity artificially forcing the users to use it (like Firefox on Ubuntu 😉) if that’s you’re asking.

      Otherwise, the only case where the user is “forced” to use flatpak would be when the software they’re looking for is not available under their distro’s repo, which happens a lot especially in point release distros.