Video-based content is already difficult to effectively moderate, because problematic content might be showcased visually, without keywords an automated AI might be able to check. And TikTok users are known for inventing shorthand and coded language specifically to evade censorship. There’s corn — or even just a corn emoji — for discussing porn, or “seggs” for sex. In the world of antisemitism, “H!tl3r” or “that Austrian painter” helps users talk about Hitler without detection.

  • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
    link
    fedilink
    2411 months ago

    Instead, on TikTok, users have little control over the videos they’re served. The main interface with the app is through the user’s homepage, called the For You Page — FYP for short — where they scroll through an infinite supply of videos served up by the app’s algorithm that play, one by one. A few might be from people they follow, but most won’t.

    I wasn’t aware of this because I avoid that app like the plague, but this is peak enshittification right here.

    • @gedaliyahOP
      link
      English
      1111 months ago

      There’s even a great YouTube video that explains why this is a terrible thing even in a landscape of terrible social media, and how it’s actually making other social media worse.

      There are a lot of people who believe quite seriously that TikTok is a psyop to deteriorate Western culture and implement a massive spyware network.

      • @[email protected]B
        link
        fedilink
        English
        111 months ago

        Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

        YouTube

        Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

        I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

    • @Quetzalcutlass
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      A while back YouTube disabled the home feed recommendations unless you have watch history turned on. The problem is, under the old behavior if you had history turned off, it’d only recommend videos based on your recent likes and watch later playlist - in other words, it’d recommend things based on what you like to watch rather than what’s popular.

      This meant users with watch history turned off got better, more relevant suggestions than those subject to the normal algorithm (where you’d get constant right-wing influencer spam if you clicked on a single vaguely political video). So of course Google disabled it. Can’t have a feature that prioritizes customer satisfaction over engagement, after all!

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        311 months ago

        Which makes total sense from Google’s point of view. They get paid when people watch YouTube. If I log on and see that Lazerpig hasn’t posted a video and then log off, I’m not using YouTube.

        But if I log on and they recommend a historical cooking show I’ll watch like ten of them in a row before I remember what I even came there for.

    • Nix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Thats how youtube is as well though? The default homepage for both is based on what you watch and like and comment on and some videos from accounts you follow. Or you can switch to the Followed/Subscriptions section for either app.

      Its like that on every social media other than mastodon

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 months ago

      It’s fantastic for finding content.

      Unfortunately less evolved humans could easily be deceived and led to extreme values, whether right or left (probably BOTH!)

      • It's A Faaaahhkeah!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Yeah you have to actively tell the algorithm what you like and especially what you don’t like, you put some effort in and you’ll get a nice feed of topics that suit you well, it’s still a shitty app that will eat your time away, but put in some effort and it will be an entertaining or informative waste of time.

  • @dlpkl
    link
    English
    811 months ago

    I’m a Canadian who leans left and I was starting to get fed Nazi videos. Usually videos of “what could have been” set to background audio of one of Hitler’s speeches. You’d be surprised at how many Arabs and Slavs are in the comments wishing that he won, waxing nostalgic about a future ruled by the “Austrian painter.”

  • Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    411 months ago

    So she struggled to find it for ages, kept searching and following links. To follow more links and eventually after going out of her way to view as much crazy conspiracy shit she got some on her feed?

    It does the same for any topic you look into. That’s how it’s meant to work, offer users content they’re showing interest in.

    You should see YouTube if you let one right wing video slip into your feed.

    • @Daveyborn
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Mother in law spends her days watching chem trail videos now because of youtube. It’s awful for conspiracy nonsense.