• originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    591 year ago

    recently cited that 40 percent of all new sign-ups opt for ads

    yeah no, sorry. thats not an endorsement that people prefer ads, thats a testament to people being fucking broke. thanks for making their lives just a little but shittier though.

    • arglebargle
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -191 year ago

      But if they are broke, why are they paying for TV? The last thing I would do is pay for streaming when money was tight…

      I get your point to a degree, but come on, they are saying it simply isn’t worth it. 3 streaming services with ads is better than 1 without or something like that.

      I mean there are a large number of free services with ads, so that has to be what they are thinking.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        181 year ago

        People still want leisure in their life and that’s cheaper than most other forms of leisure. Just because someone’s broke doesn’t mean they will inherently not want easy access to entertainment.

        • arglebargle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -14
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Like I said there are a lot of free streaming services with ads, no need to pay for them.

          And frankly there is a lot of leisure to be had that is not paying a streaming bill.

          Don’t get me wrong, i simply will not pay for ads, so it is principle with me. But apparently some people are happy with both.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        31 year ago

        It’s a money grab. Our Netflix plan price didn’t change, but they added ads. I can pay extra to get the same service I used to get.

        They are just greedy for money and actively make the product worse instead of better. What better way than to encourage piracy.

        • arglebargle
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -11 year ago

          netflix money grab

          I agree with you. That is what businesses do. So I dump em. Years ago, maybe 2014 I received a Hulu subscription in payment for something I was selling. I started using it, and there were ads! To this day I will not pay for, or even watch for free, Hulu. It is principle with me.

          But apparently I am alone on this. I got downvoted massively for saying it looks like people WILL still pay for ads, even if they can barely afford it. That I cannot understand. I wont do it if I can afford it, and I certainly wouldnt do it I could barely afford it. So the businesses win and keep scraping for more revenue.

          With hundreds of free (and legal) options with commercials, why the hell would anyone pay for video streaming if they are giving you ads anyways?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    301 year ago

    So creatives aren’t happy. Customers aren’t happy. Broadcasters seem happy.

    End-stage enshittification confirmed?

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      Customers keep paying though. As long as that keeps happening they’ll keep doing it.

  • ME5SENGER_24
    link
    251 year ago

    I canceled cable service for 2 reasons: 1) commercials 2) watching 4 channels and paying for 100

    Now with streaming, commercials are back and Im finding it harder and harder to locate decent things to watch.

    Not sure where to turn next

      • ME5SENGER_24
        link
        81 year ago

        I’ve got my own Plex server but I’ve seen everything on it multiple times. Time to dust off the old eyepatch and peg leg, I guess

    • @Cort
      link
      21 year ago

      With the writers and actors strikes this year, I think it’ll probably be slim pickens until summer or potentially autumn.

  • @jordanlund
    link
    151 year ago

    What I want to know is how much money could insurance companies (cough, Liberty Mutual, cough) POSSIBLY be saving people when they are buying ads on every video on Youtube.

    • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
      link
      English
      81 year ago

      I don’t know why but those Liberty Mutual commercials go in one ear and right out the other for me. I have YouTube Red so don’t know those but they sponsor live sports like crazy and one game this year, I was like, “What’s that emu about?” And my friend said, “Dude, they’ve been showing the emu commercials non-stop for like 5 years.”

      I just googled it and they debuted the “LiMu Emu and Doug” campaign in 2019. So, it was 4 years before I noticed the emu. It’s good I can ignore ads but I would have definitely died in The Emu Wars.

        • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
          link
          English
          31 year ago

          I aced that test but in fairness, I happened to be watching a basketball game when I saw your post and clicked the link. So, I was coming in primed for seeing ball movement and the occasional gorilla popping in frame.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I wish I could see a liberty ad.

      The only crap I see is “before you buy something on Amazon, see this” garbage.

  • freamon
    link
    fedilink
    English
    131 year ago

    It’s guaranteed to be worse: TV episodes are completely structured around whether the creators expect ads, and where in the runtime the ad will be (so they can resolve or tease a plot point before them).

    The addition of ads, or having more ad breaks than the original transmitter of a show had, will break the structure.

    And then of course there’s the ‘Spotify question’: are these ads genuinely supporting a subscription, or are they there to annoy you into paying for one by disrupting the flow of an episode as much as possible?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 year ago

    Welp, Paramount Plus has the Super Bowl and then Halo S2, which looks like it might be worth watching. After that it goes on the canceled pile with Netflix and “Max.”

    I only have Hulu and Disney Plus at this point because they’re bundled with my phone plan, and Prime because of Amazon. I have Apple TV+ during MLS season.

    But otherwise I’ll just stick to my Blu-ray collection and sign up for Netflix ad-free or whatever for two months every two years and binge everything worth watching. My backlog is long enough to last me years at this point.

  • @werefreeatlast
    link
    21 year ago

    We should just vote with our wallets… actually I think I need a new wallet, but right after that yeah.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    After a swift click on “not now,” this viewer cued up one of the more successful titles currently gracing Amazon’s roster — the second season of beefcake vigilante drama Reacher.

    Interruptions, which included a spot for another series (Hudson & Rex, starring a German Shepherd detective) and a reminder from the folks at Intuit Turbotax that filling season has commenced, were indeed limited.

    “We fought so hard to get rid of commercials,” says Alan Poul, executive producer and director of Max original Tokyo Vice which returns for a second season on Feb. 8.

    Paramount expands its own ad-supported tier internationally later in 2024 — and though no official plans have been announced, recent hires at Apple TV+ suggest the tech behemoth will eventually introduce ads as well.

    David E. Kelley, the one-time broadcast golden boy who gave audiences Picket Fences, Chicago Hope and Ally McBeal before pivoting to premiere outlets like HBO (Big Little Lies) and Netflix (The Lincoln Lawyer), seems similarly disenchanted.

    Netflix, which recently cited that 40 percent of all new sign-ups opt for ads, announced the “retirement” of its least expensive commercial-free tier in the coming second quarter.


    The original article contains 1,205 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 84%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!