• Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    214 months ago

    it will label nine of the thousands of PFAS “forever chemicals” as hazardous.

    I see the industry has had a say.

    • @AA5B
      link
      104 months ago

      There is a point that maybe we need to do things a different way. All complaints aside, EPA regulates chemicals one by one: how do you even handle classes of thousands of chemicals?

      • @HeyJoe
        link
        54 months ago

        Personally I would consider all of them unsafe until they are identified. Pretty sure that’s how pharmaceutical drugs are handled so I’m not sure why it would be different for chemicals we don’t know about. If the process is to slow then it’s obvious the EPA needs a bigger budget and staff to work on this, instead of when Trump tried to cripple it even more than it already is…

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        34 months ago

        I don’t know how the EPA regulates in particular but you can describe PFAS by their definition which uses the common components that give them the properties they have.

  • Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    84 months ago

    Environmental Pathetic Agency more like it, what a weak fucking proposal.

    • @NegativeInf
      link
      44 months ago

      Then vote for someone who will put a more robust EPA policy in place. Senate, house, president.