• originalucifer
    link
    fedilink
    1811 months ago

    why would you need a Nuke against a satellite? youd think a good laser would do pretty well in close proximity with a lot less debris

    • @AllonzeeLV
      link
      English
      29
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Widespread EMP could take out many satellites at once.

      A nuclear detonation is just the only practical way to generate a giant one.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1011 months ago

      The magic part is that you launch the nuke through the satellite, then it falls back to earth on top of your enemy.

      Or perhaps the debris is the point?

    • @EdibleFriend
      link
      English
      611 months ago

      I mean… The nuke would work though

    • @lemmylommy
      link
      English
      311 months ago

      Too big and too high power requirements

    • lurch (he/him)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      russians need some margin when aiming. they always hit kindergardens, when they aim for military facilities. /s

  • @100_percent_a_bot
    link
    English
    1011 months ago

    They could try to develop anti satellite technology like building roofs over their vehicle lots so we can’t watch them pull 60 year old tanks to the front in real time but no, another doomsday weapon it is…

    • @Plopp
      link
      English
      311 months ago

      Your thinking is old school and not at all dynamic enough for the modern battlefield. Mount the roofs on top of the vehicles instead. It’ll fool everyone. “What’s that? Oh it’s just a convoy of cottages being moved south for the winter, or summer or whatever.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    811 months ago

    From reading other stuff it seems much more likely that its a nuclear powered satellite jammer, not a nuclear satellite weapon. Nuclear powered would allow it to more effectively jam for longer distances/periods of time. We all have nuclear powered satellites in orbit which breaks no nuclear treaties so it sounds like they’re being intentionally vague for some russia fearmongering.

    Not to say it’s not bad tho - it could take out commercial satellites like starlink very effectively and we know how critical that’s been for Ukraine/would be for Taiwan

  • ArxCyberwolf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 months ago

    Russia can’t even make ball bearings or a modern working tank and jet, and their technology is consistently proven to be beaten by 40 year old equipment… I don’t think this is going to be a serious threat.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      811 months ago

      They already have functional orbital rockets and nukes… A nuclear space-based EMP isn’t much of a leap from there.

      • @Coreidan
        link
        English
        111 months ago

        Says who? Russia?

        They can’t even attend the Olympics without cheating their asses off.