• @Potatos_are_not_friends
    link
    English
    9
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    At work, we have chatgpt for code AI support.

    But at home, I use bard (or Gemini now). Also Gemini does not have a api I can go into.

    Comparing the two with about half a year of usage –

    Gemini has been giving better answers overall. One extremely good use case is writing JavaScript and node. It frequently gives me modern JS, and often is correct in one or two prompts. Where Chatgpt, I have to modify the prompt a few times to request esmodules over commonjs and some other technical details. It freaks me out how bad some of the Chatgpt JS code examples are and worried to see my juniors use it.

    Another is that Gemini also gets updated with the latest data. Ive been doing a lot of hobby research on geography and time periods of the geography, and Chatgpt frequently has to get fact checked. One major wtf was when the area I was researching had a “Springfield”, and Chatgpt gave me Simpsons storefronts.

    Chatgpt has been just better for creativity. Those hallucinations are hilarious, and have been great for placeholder content or to help me flesh something out.

    Chatgpt (or maybe OpenAI) generates better art. Gemini just released that option, so I haven’t done much comparison.

    I honestly don’t care who wins. I’m just trying to do cool shit with AI while we’re still in a wild West of it.

    • @small44
      link
      English
      49 months ago

      For art both are a joke compared to midjourney

    • kratoz29
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      I honestly don’t care who wins. I’m just trying to do cool shit with AI while we’re still in a wild West of it.

      I have had this thought since the beginning I started using ChatGPT, I’m honestly so glad there is a lot of competition to make this something that won’t be locked down and capitalized by a single company… Yet.

  • @Harbinger01173430
    link
    English
    99 months ago

    Can it think? No, I don’t think it can. It’s just another bullshit generator

  • Cloudless ☼
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    Meanwhile,

    “Okay Google, set a timer for 5 minutes.”

    Google Home:

    “Sorry. I don’t understand. By the way, you should listen to what I say, and you can’t stop me saying ‘by the way’.”

    • @SkyezOpen
      link
      English
      79 months ago

      On the bright side, my Google assistant understood me calling her a dumb fucking bitch after the 4th “I don’t understand” and apologized.

      Also why are these fuckers not using ai for natural language processing? “Hey Google, turn the living room lights off and the bedroom lights on and change them to blue” should be simple to parse with an llm, but I have to say hey Google 3 times to accomplish that.

  • @small44
    link
    English
    59 months ago

    It still can’t do a lot of what chatgpt can do like giving a csv and telling it to format it based on a certain prompt.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    19 months ago

    Ohh, this headline aged like milk, LOL. 😂

    It is powerful, as long as you don’t ask it to generate anything involving white people. 🤣😂🤣

  • LughOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -49 months ago

    Wow, Feb 15th 2024 will be looked back on as a big day in the history of AI. OpenAi’s Sora & this announcement by Google. Both with huge implications.