• BeardedSingleMalt
    link
    fedilink
    514 months ago

    I’ve said it in other threads, but these “free” anti-virus software packages are there to use scare tactics to get you to upgrade to paid versions and other products. I used avast, and avg in previous PCs and every other day it was popups

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I’m pretty sure that a lot of these virus and malware scanners began as normal and well-intentioned businesses, and only later went bad.

      I used to use Avast and AVG back in the day (like 10+ years ago) and they mostly just sat back and did what you’d expect, without being intrusive about it.

      But of course the inevitable march of capitalism happens and they all start trying to make more and more money. Intimidating users with scare tactics. Aggressive pop-ups. Selling user data.

      Wouldn’t go near them these days with a shitty stick.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        I don’t think the good guys necessarily turn bad, more often than not they just sell the brand… and why not I guess.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    334 months ago

    Why is this company allowed to exist anymore is my question. If it just openly lies to its customers it should be sued into destitution.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      14
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yep. Nationalize that sucker for just long enough to sell every asset, IP and piece of real estate, and turn over the money to those harmed by the crime.

      There’s zero excuse for allowing Avast to continue to exist after what amounts to intentional wide scale fraud.

      Edit: To be clear, I’m not advocating for an approach outside of current laws, I’m saying we need to fix the laws and tackle the next one of these correctly.

      CEOs and shareholders can get on board, because they also want a peaceful no-heads-lopped-off resolution to this kind of crap, too. Everyone can still win, here.

    • @Mango
      link
      English
      24 months ago

      It’s literally a crime organization. Shut them down completely! This shouldn’t be a matter of making a couple lawyers rich and letting them continue.

  • @HootinNHollerin
    link
    English
    27
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    So when are the users gonna get a check?

  • Aniki 🌱🌿
    link
    fedilink
    English
    184 months ago

    Not having to worry about antivirus software, by itself, is reason enough to use Linux. That’s not to say that there aren’t but the vectors are so much more obscure than Winblows.

        • @Dkarma
          link
          English
          84 months ago

          He literally just Googled Linux malware 😂😂😂😂😂

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        04 months ago

        If you intentionally start downloading malicious binaries and scripts, then no freaking magic AI-accelerated from the future anti-virus would protect you.

        In Linux we don’t download any binaries (.exe) at all. Everything is from trustes repositories, which, btw, are validated using checksums and TLS certificates. Not perfect, but like 99.9% more secure than going to phishing site and downloading binary.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    44 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Avast, the cybersecurity software company, is facing a $16.5 million fine after it was caught storing and selling customer information without their consent.

    The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced the fine on Thursday and said that it’s banning Avast from selling user data for advertising purposes.

    From at least 2014 to 2020, Avast harvested user web browsing information through its antivirus software and browser extension, according to the FTC’s complaint.

    “We are committed to our mission of protecting and empowering people’s digital lives,” Avast spokesperson Jess Monney said in a statement to The Verge.

    “While we disagree with the FTC’s allegations and characterization of the facts, we are pleased to resolve this matter and look forward to continuing to serve our millions of customers around the world.”

    In January, the FTC reached a settlement with Outlogic (formerly X-Mode Social) that prevents the data broker from selling information that can be used to track users’ locations.


    The original article contains 398 words, the summary contains 155 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!