Gyrados, as well all know, is actually a Water/Flying type. This was done because Dragon was not a type in the game when Gyrados was introduced.

Should this be fixed on have his type changed to what he was based on? A Chinese Water Dragon?

  • Myr
    link
    English
    137 months ago

    Isn’t the Dratini line dragon type in Gen 1? The same games that Gyarados was introduced.

    • @NOT_RICK
      link
      English
      117 months ago

      Yes, OP is wrong. Dragon type existed in Gen 1 and was wildly overpowered.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 months ago

      Yeah and the Dratini line was the only dragon type in gen 1 and was supposed to be very powerful and psudo-legendary.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if they decided against giving Gyarados the dragon type because of that specific lore reason as it’s never made a whole lot of sense to me that it had the flying type either. I think Gyarados would be too strong both offensively and defensively if it didn’t have the quad elec weakness which is probably why it’s the way it is. (Disclaimer: I know nothing of Pokemon beyond gen4 and feel free to disregard my opinions)