• @Buddahriffic
    link
    957 months ago

    Jurisdiction is established by force, not the existence of documents. I mean, not having birth certificates isn’t stopping the government from taking the kids, what do these fucking idiots think it does accomplish?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      507 months ago

      That in 16 years’ time, when the cops pull young Jaxyn over for speeding, they’ll have to let him go because, not having had a birth certificate, they have no authority over him. And think of the money he’ll save by never having to pay tax or child support.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        347 months ago

        Not to mention, they’ll have immediate access to the 3 million dollar account the government sets up for every citizen to have as soon as they reject their citizenship or whatever dumb shit that is.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          217 months ago

          Though who needs that when you can get all the money you need by scribbling an IOU on a napkin and passing it as legal tender in your capacity as a sovereign?

          • @Smokeydope
            link
            English
            7
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Just gotta make sure the scribbles are at a 45° angle, in blue ink, with a blood stained thumbprint as signature. I’ve heard if the napkin is made from the dried skin of your first born and has some sigils only the highest level sovcits know, it levels up the IOU to trade for a house!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      357 months ago

      One of the key disconnects that these people believe is that you can unilaterally negate all our part of any contract at their sole discretion.

      In this case getting a birth certificate is acceptance on their mind of a contract they wish to reject.

      • @Dkarma
        link
        37 months ago

        All of USA case law is predicated on the supposition if an inherent contact with the state.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          67 months ago

          Yes, this is one of the main points in the sovcit beliefs that’s logical and mostly correct. Most beliefs have these points that help draw people into the really crazy stuff. You can’t recruit people to your beliefs if you start with the negotiable instrument nonsense.

    • @Treczoks
      link
      167 months ago

      what do these fucking idiots think

      They don’t, that’s why they appear as articles in this community…

    • @BonesOfTheMoonOPM
      link
      157 months ago

      They think it’ll keep them from being apprehended, spoiler it doesn’t work.

      • Illecors
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        I somewhat wish you had used a spoiler tag here 😁

        They think it’ll keep them from being apprehended,

        spoiler

        It doesn’t work

    • @TexasDrunk
      link
      287 months ago

      Not a bad question considering a lot of the kinds of people who are SovCit don’t really understand what the hell the US is and a pretty big chunk are “The South Will Rise Again” type folks. But the answer is Child Advocacy Services. The other would be the Confederate States of America, Confederate States, or just the Confederacy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        107 months ago

        Ah. I’ve never seen that particular acronym before. I’ve seen DCFS (Dept. Children & Family Services), and a few others.

      • @TexasDrunk
        link
        57 months ago

        Oohhhh, depending on where it’s at that could be true too.

    • @hydrospanner
      link
      97 months ago

      Close Air Support

      Gonna sic an A-10 Warthog on her ass.