• @Mango
    link
    12 months ago

    Yeah well I won the Internet last month.

  • @return2ozmaOP
    link
    -112 months ago

    I know there’s some so… giant /S

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -462 months ago

    Who else is voting 3rd party this November? Maybe we well get lucky and both will move on before the election.

    • @WaxedWookie
      link
      302 months ago

      Maybe pick the lesser evil rather than pissing your vote away and enabling the worse option?

    • @GardenVarietyAnxiety
      link
      132 months ago

      You can object on moral grounds or principles…and I’m right there with you. I get it.

      But you can not disagree with the black and white math. One of them is getting it.

      Are you really equally okay with either outcome? The dude has told us, himself, what he plans to do.

      “I’ll only be a dictator on day one” To do what? And why will you need dictatorial powers to do it??

      I just can’t fathom this “lol fuck the man” mindset. We’re all in this situation whether we like it or not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      132 months ago

      The time for advocating 3rd party is after the election. A 3rd party has no chance with only a year of really getting pushed, should have happened 3 years ago and it failed this time around. Try to get enthusiasm for a third party after the election. Too much at stake this time around for a last minute protest vote.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        52 months ago

        No, the time for a 3rd party presidential run is after that third party already has local and state support/positions. Top-down attempts at creating a viable third party have virtually no chance at changing the status quo, and would likely make it worse as they’d be deadlocked with Congress and voted out after one term. Then we’ll have to hear forever about how this party was a terrible idea…

        • @Ensign_Crab
          link
          English
          42 months ago

          The time for advocating for third parties is always conveniently some other time.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            I’m really confused how you got that from my comment, and it seems from the downvotes, others thought similarly. I’m advocating for more, real action, and more third party candidates, instead of hollow longshot bids that, even if successful, would be deleterious (not to mention the many more poison pill candidates like RFK Jr. who were never acting in good faith to begin with).

            • @Ensign_Crab
              link
              English
              02 months ago

              I’m really confused how you got that from my comment

              How did I get “it’s never the time” from “it’s not the time”? Easy. Been hearing “It’s not the time” for decades.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                5
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                It’s not the time for a presidential third party run… but it is the time for third parties to create bottom-up change. These aren’t mutually exclusive, but one is clearly the better option

                • @Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  English
                  02 months ago

                  It’s not the time for a presidential third party run…

                  Conveniently never is and never will be.

          • @thesporkeffect
            link
            12 months ago

            If you are serious, we have to start by getting rid of FPTP voting and then we can have this discussion

            • Sybil
              link
              12 months ago

              The time for advocating for third parties is always conveniently some other time.

              • @thesporkeffect
                link
                02 months ago

                I feel like you’re being obtuse here. You can’t get mad if you hit the gas and the car goes in the wrong direction, if you refuse to shift out of reverse first

                • Sybil
                  link
                  12 months ago

                  I feel like you don’t understand other people’s motivations and intent

            • @Ensign_Crab
              link
              English
              02 months ago

              See? Always conveniently some other time.

              Just say you’re happy with the two party pro-genocide hegemony.

              • @thesporkeffect
                link
                02 months ago

                I’m not. But I don’t think another Trump presidency will improve our voting options afterwards. Do you think so?

                • @Ensign_Crab
                  link
                  English
                  02 months ago

                  Oh look, this fucking argument again. "If you’re unhappy at all with Biden, you must want Trump!’

                  Don’t worry. I’m voting for the pro-genocide candidate you want me to.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      This is Haley’s plan. I honestly don’t know how Kamala vs Halley would go down. I assume the Whitehouse would be on fire by the end of November.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        -9
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        What about a Kamala+Halley?

        they can figure which is VP later. Haley’s plan is to watch trump die so she can claim the nomination. not that I think Haley would be any better than Trump.

    • @thesporkeffect
      link
      32 months ago

      Ah, you mean voting for Trump? That’s what you’re doing.

    • @Anamnesis
      link
      22 months ago

      You should only do this if you’re not in a swing state. There’s too much at stake to risk it in a swing state.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -32 months ago

      That’s what I did last time I was offered that choice, and my opinion of neither of them is any better today than it was then.