• kbal
    link
    fedilink
    910 months ago

    Not so much a bomb, more of a… what’s the opposite of a bomb? A slowly deflating beach ball?

    • @Visstix
      link
      English
      710 months ago

      A depopulation woopie cussion

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There are economical implications to this development. But IMHO population decline is necessary to ease the pressure on the ecosystem. 34% of mammals are humans, 62% is livestock, only 4% are wild animals. We shifted the natural world so far out of balance, that the need to sacrifice economic growth for sustainability is inevitable.

    https://ourworldindata.org/wild-mammals-birds-biomass

    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/eight-billion-people-in-the-world-is-a-crisis-not-an-achievement/

    • kbal
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      In truth the bomb has already gone off and we’re living in its aftermath. Secondary explosions are still going on in various places. Humanity is slowly coming to its senses but isn’t fully aware yet of all the damage that’s been done.

    • @[email protected]M
      link
      fedilink
      English
      210 months ago

      Problem is that other wildlife is unlikely to survive the bottleneck of human population

  • possibly a catM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    310 months ago

    I’m not so certain it will unroll slowly. I think there could be a feedback mechanism involved, specifically related to economic organization and its inability to react in a sufficiently timely manner.