cross-posted from: https://sopuli.xyz/post/10354955

If “category” has a better name…

Isn’t it just “composite”?

Every arrow in category can be composed, the set(or class or whatnot…) of that is composite.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    I think the name “context wrapper” is meaningful representation. To me, (and i emphasise the to me part) It’s something that wraps on type to add more information to it.

    For instance a time type could be wrapped in timezone Monad. To stop time being manipulated without the context (time zone) being corrupt, we use map to only allow specific changes to instance inside the monad.

    I wrote a little blog post on my interpretation if anyone’s interested: https://blog.philliptaylor.net/?post=monads-for-oo-programmers.md

  • @marcos
    link
    17 months ago

    I guess all the good names were taken.

    Categories are just the same as half of math, with less historical cargo so that they can all forced to look the same. But well, that historical stuff already took all the names.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I came up with “composite”.

      If people would accept “category”… I mean, we could also have accepted anything, except the new one can express its semantics.

      • @marcos
        link
        17 months ago

        “Composition” is one of those historically loaded names.