A Japanese high court ruled Thursday the country’s lack of legal recognition of same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, in a move likely to further mount pressure on the government to do more to protect sexual minorities.

The Sapporo High Court upheld the lower court’s landmark verdict in 2021 that said non-recognition of same-sex marriage violates the right to equality protected under the Constitution but rejected a total of 6 million yen ($40,600) in damages sought by three same-sex couples in Hokkaido against the state for emotional distress.

The plaintiffs said they will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.

  • Toes♀
    link
    fedilink
    English
    129 months ago

    Oh that’s wonderful news. This is cause for serious celebration, thank you for sharing this.

  • Zagorath
    link
    fedilink
    English
    79 months ago

    The plaintiffs said they will appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.

    Wait, they can appeal a decision which they won

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      99 months ago

      The article has a paragraph later on that says:

      In rejecting the plaintiffs’ claims for damages, the court said, “It cannot be said that discussions at the Diet…regarding provisions not allowing same-sex marriage are clearly in violation of the Constitution.”

      I suspect the plaintiffs are only appealing that aspect of the judgment.

    • @kautau
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      My guess is it means because the high court voted it as unconstitutional, they are raising the issue to Japan’s Supreme Court to make it a national ruling

      • @NateNate60
        link
        English
        29 months ago

        Japan isn’t a federation, there is no “federal”

        • @kautau
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          True, my word of choice should have been national, thanks for pointing that out, I’ll edit my comment

  • @CluckN
    link
    English
    09 months ago

    I was hoping the court would remain sober when making the decision.

    • @jordanlundM
      link
      English
      39 months ago

      Removed, racism. Rule 4.

      “Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.”