- cross-posted to:
- forgottenweapons
- cross-posted to:
- forgottenweapons
Context: https://youtu.be/DA3VsMteAxk
You must log in or register to comment.
Sergeant: “How did this happen Private?”
Private: “Well you see Sarge…”
Man that guy’s hair is seriously out or regs.
I believe some people call it “docking”
Google it, enlighten yourselves 😬
Ahhh that’s what docker is for. Reddit keeps telling me to try it
make sure you disable your antivirus, disable safe search, and click on images
I use this irl as often as possible, it’s not really lol, but offers me great satisfaction somehow.
I love that something like this couldn’t be dealt with by just telling soldiers not to do it, but that they instead had to modify the bayonet design. “Our soldiers are going to do this now that we know it’s possible, so we need to redesign things”.
deleted by creator
That’s like a “wet paint” sign, guaranteed to have at least one person do it, just to see why they’re not allowed.
For those who dont know: there is a rifle (MAS-36) that had a bayonet that could be concealed at the end of the rifle, taken out, and then attached to be used in combat. The bayonet had locking mechanism on both the pointed and blunt end. And since either end could be attached to the rifle, it is said that two solders wondered what would happen if they attached the bayonet ends to 2 rifles. It worked, and it turned out there was no way to seperate them once they were put together, and this ended up being called the french finger trap. Fortunately, later versions of this rifle had a safety mechanism that allowed you to seperate the two rifles in the event you tried to repeat it.
MAS to MAS.
At least it’s not their foreskins this time.
deleted by creator
