• Fal@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    What the shit is this article? I get the style they were going for, but come on

    • Kethal
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      2 years ago

      No kidding. Carlson is a terrible person, and this writing is nearly as bad. I thought Mother Jones was at least somewhat respectable and wasn’t expecting this garbage.

      • pdxfed
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        They have been garbage for a long time.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I thought it was hilarious, but I didn’t expect this from Mother Jones

  • mysoulishome
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    2 years ago

    Some guys told them they edited Kate Middleton’s pics and were whistleblowers so he interviewed them. They told him we aren’t really this is a prank and he said nuh uh.

    Link to clip, I’m not watching it. The article was funny in the wording but the whole thing itself doesn’t actually seem very funny.

    https://twitter.com/joshua_pieters/status/1768410708025221121

  • Lumidaub@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    After reading this article, I feel like I should know what actually happened on the show - I don’t though?

  • Thorny_Insight@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    2 years ago

    If you make it clear in the very first sentence that you’re heavily biased then I’m not going to finish reading it because you can’t be trusted.

    • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Tucker is one of the last media personalities I can think of that deserves any kind of a break.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      I was going to ask whether you thought this counted as news in the first place, but, after consideration, realized this probably is your typical brand of hard hitting journalism.

  • It's A Faaaahhkeah!@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    2 years ago

    Well that’s not a completely biased article at all…

    I like the part where they admit they only know about him from YouTube video titles.

    I’m not defending Tucker, but at least try to hide your bias, put some effort in ffs.

    • Gamoc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ha, bias. You don’t need to be biased to dislike Tucker Carlson, you just need to be unbiased.