In December, DARPA announced that it was working with 14 different companies under LunA-10, including major space players such as Northrop Grumman and SpaceX, as well as non-space firms such as Nokia. These companies are assessing how services such as power and communications could be established on the Moon, and they’re due to provide a final report by June.

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    68 months ago

    I won’t consider any plans “serious” until they admit the SLS isn’t going to be part of them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Isn’t it a big government business that hires a lot of people?

      What politician would want to cancel that and lose votes?

    • Pennomi
      link
      English
      18 months ago

      SLS is a pretty badass rocket but damn is it expensive, prohibitively so.

      I wonder if there’s a more achievable lunar architecture that just uses a ton of Falcon Heavy launches instead. Maybe a lunar cycler?

      • FaceDeer
        link
        fedilink
        38 months ago

        Given that SpaceX Starship is already on the critical path for Artemis anyway, I’d plan on using that if I was in charge. Falcon/Dragon launches can be used to put crew in space if Starship itself can’t be man-rated in time.

        • Pennomi
          link
          English
          28 months ago

          Yeah I’m mostly worried about the time it takes to get Starship stable and rated for humans. It took around 10 years from the first Falcon 9 launch to the first crewed Falcon 9… I certainly hope that it goes faster for Starship.

          • FaceDeer
            link
            fedilink
            48 months ago

            We don’t actually need Starship to be man-rated, though. Use it to launch cargo, fuel, and unmanned vehicles, and then send astronauts up on a Falcon 9 (which is already routinely shuttling people to space) and have them transfer over in orbit.

            We don’t even need Starship to be reusable for it to be cheaper than SLS. Though reusability is another whole order of magnitude or two of improvement.

  • @[email protected]B
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    DARPA (Defense) Advanced Research Projects Agency, DoD
    DoD US Department of Defense
    SLS Space Launch System heavy-lift

    [Thread #37 for this sub, first seen 19th Mar 2024, 20:50] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    As part of this initiative, NASA seeks to foster a lunar economy in which the space agency is not the sole customer.

    Last year, the defense agency announced it was initiating a study, LunA-10, to understand how best to facilitate a thriving lunar economy by 2035.

    In December, DARPA announced that it was working with 14 different companies under LunA-10, including major space players such as Northrop Grumman and SpaceX, as well as non-space firms such as Nokia.

    These companies are assessing how services such as power and communications could be established on the Moon, and they’re due to provide a final report by June.

    “Based on technical work and development conducted under the LunA-10 study, I have identified six hypotheses where, if revolutionary improvements in technology can be made, I assess that a direct acceleration to the fielding of a lunar economy is likely to occur,” Nayak said in the paper.

    Last Thursday, based on the ideas elucidated in Nayak’s paper, DARPA issued a “Request for Information” for technological capabilities that could scale up lunar exploration and commerce.


    The original article contains 544 words, the summary contains 179 words. Saved 67%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!