• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    261 year ago

    At first glance I thought this looks likes some gritty Tim burton reboot. Then I realized we already got that.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      171 year ago

      To be fair, the Tim Burton film was far closer to the original novel. And that’s what I grew up with, so the 70s gene wilder version (that Dahl hated) never gelled with me.

      • @danc4498
        link
        English
        271 year ago

        Just like Stephen King hated the far superior The Shining movie. The author’s can be wrong sometimes.

        • VM_Abrantes
          link
          fedilink
          25
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          King: What’s with these changes? Jack Torrence is supposed to overcome the evil and save his family!

          Kubrick: Dude, have you even read this story? Jack Torrence is an irredeemable monster.

          King: [tearing up] I’M THAT IRREDEEMABLE MONSTER

          • PenguinJuice
            link
            fedilink
            51 year ago

            Idk, I liked the book more than the movie but maybe I’m missing something.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              71 year ago

              Kubrick’s movie was a good, scary movie that was definitely inspired by the book.

              The TV series was lower quality, but I believe a better adaptation of the book.

              I really appreciate that movie version of Dr Sleep did an amazing job of blending Kubrick’s version with King’s novels. Enough so that I think it pulls Kubrick’s movie back into line where it feels less divergent from the original book.

          • @danc4498
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            Oh, maybe this explains it.

            • maegul (he/they)
              link
              fedilink
              English
              71 year ago

              According to King, the only conversation they about the book/film was Kubrick called him and asked whether he believed in God.

              I (and my partner) have read into that Kubrick did indeed see into the book that King was writing about himself and wanted to get a handle on what kind of frame of reference King had in doing so.

      • Discoslugs
        link
        English
        11 year ago

        I didnt read the original print of Charlie and the chocolate factory but:

        Didnt dalh orginally write the oompah loompahs to be black pygmies from africa?

          • Discoslugs
            link
            English
            11 year ago

            It changed after his publisher made him do it.

  • @Son_of_dad
    link
    English
    121 year ago

    I’m already sick of this kid. He’s soulless. He was raised from birth to be an actor and it shows in his lack of humanity

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      Yeesh that’s harsh. I think he’s quite talented. I’ll take him over yet another nepobaby.

    • 'M' as in 'MANCY'
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      He plays a certain role very well - the moody, pouty, teenager that’s grappling with coming to his own. But beyond that, he doesn’t have much of a range, and tends to do too much when the director doesn’t rein him in. I think he’s talented, but not worthy of all the overt thirstiness that Film Twitter bestows on him.

    • @SpezCanLigmaBalls
      link
      English
      31 year ago

      I don’t know much of his story and growing up so I’m not gonna comment on that but I didn’t really like him in dune. Just rubbed me the wrong way for some reason

      • maegul (he/they)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Yea it wasn’t until someone wrote that he was the weakest part of the movie that I realised I basically felt the same way. Every actor fills their role in that film (I think Bardem as Stilgar is my favourite) but there’s something not quite there in his performance. To be fair it’s probably a hard role to cast for. But yea, in going to see part 2, his acting isn’t what I’m looking forward to, and that is honestly a bit of a shame. But you know, maybe that’s Paul, maybe you don’t really see him … I’m wondering if there are some quotes to back this up now.

        • Discoslugs
          link
          English
          21 year ago

          I completely disagree.

          I dont know what i was looking for in Paul Atreides charactet but i cant imagine a more fitting person to play him.

          Moody awkward, young and alittle entitled. Just like a 16 year old who is to inherit a whole planet.

          • maegul (he/they)
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 year ago

            I didn’t hate his portrayal, not at all actually. A more accurate statement would be that it felt, to me, to be a weak point of the film.

            I agree with you, generally, it’s just for me there was a hollowness there. But I can totally see his performance working very well for others. I’m definitely looking forward to part 2!!

  • @buycurious
    link
    English
    11 year ago

    Looks pretty good to me!

    Granted, it’s a screenshot and still way too early to tell overall.

    • @ABCDE
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      The trailer looks okay, but I didn’t watch the Burton one as it just looked a little off.