• @HereIAm
        link
        162 months ago

        Ah, so you are the guy who created “On Error Resume Next” in Visual Basic and populated it in the beginning of every function in my company’s code! I hate you!

        • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
          link
          English
          102 months ago

          “On Error Resume Next” in Visual Basic

          This is always presented as the worst thing about Visual Basic, which is incorrect. The worst thing was “On Error Resume” which just re-executed the line that caused the error in the first place.

          • @HereIAm
            link
            82 months ago

            I will keep this knowledge a closely guarded secret.

  • @ChickenLadyLovesLife
    link
    English
    322 months ago

    I never, ever hated my job as a programmer as much as when I was forced to do pair programming. If I’d wanted to be around another person all day, I never would have become a programmer in the first place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      45
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I actually asked chatGPT about a specific issue I had and solved a while back. It was one of these issues where it looked like a simple naive solution would be sufficient, but due to different conditions that fails, you have to go with a more complex solution. So, I asked about this to see what it would answer. And it went with the simpler solution, but with some adjustments. The code also didn’t compile. But it looked interesting enough, for me to question my self. Maybe it was just me that failed the simpler solution, so I actually tried to fix the compile errors to see if I could get it working. But the more I tried to fix its code the more obvious it got that it didn’t have a clue about what it was doing. However, due to the confidence and ability to make things look plausible, it sent me on a wild goose chase. And this is why I am not using LLM for programming. They are basically overconfident junior devs, that likes mansplaining.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        112 months ago

        It’s not always right but it saves me tonnes of time at work, usually when I want to do something simple in a language or environment I’m not totally familiar with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          62 months ago

          It can reliably copy the simple things in it’s training data from stackoverflow.

          But at that point, why not just go to stackoverflow instead?

          • @DrCake
            link
            82 months ago

            I find that sometimes I can’t quite describe the problem well enough for google to find results. The conversational nature of ChatGPT means I usually can get a good enough answer from it

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            52 months ago

            I’m not saying it’s going to take anyone’s job anytime soon but it’s a lot quicker to get something tailor made for your problem than going to stack overflow. Everyone should use the tools that work for them but don’t sleep on this stuff, like any tool it’s really helpful once you know how to use it.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              32 months ago

              Agreed. But I think it is utterly useless if you aren’t experienced enough to tell if it is bullshitting. Almost every time I have asked for a little adjustment, it just makes something up that looks good on first glance. My favorite is when it invents python libraries that magically handle all the difficult stuff. But man is it useful for my crappy little bash scripts or regex.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                Absolutely true. I think regex might be one of my favourite uses to be honest. Both in writing them and explaining wth an existing one is doing.

          • TheUnamusedFox
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 months ago

            Gpt4 is pretty awesome for simple stuff. I’ve just started learning python (Knowing no other language) and made my first project a pyqt GUI for editing the config of a FOSS project. It’s reasoning ability is not great, but when you clearly lay out what you want to do, how you want to do it, it because a fantastic natural language to code interpreter. All the fiddly bits I dread typing out I just pop into gpt 3.5, and more complicated stuff gpt4.

            I have learned a lot from debugging whenever it gets stuck, and being able to create an actual usable program right from the start is awesome.

            Even better is slowly realizing you are understanding what’s going on, and the dread of actually studying to learn the language becomes a genuine desire to learn more.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          It has encouraged my colleagues to get answers from it that would be easily available with a google search (and by asking me - my fault for acting like they are a pita for not extrapolating from previous explanations). Resulting in:

          1. Trying to sudo apt install on a RHEL system
            • Looking for an apt RPM package on the internet
          2. Looking for RPM packages of almost every unavailable thingy on the internet.
          3. In general, succeeding 90% at a task (not 90% of the times, but 90% part of it) and going with it. Only to later realise the remaining 10% invalidated all their effort.
      • @marx2k
        link
        42 months ago

        I don’t do it enough, but I do enjoy using it (it being perplexity.ai) for getting code examples of stuff I’m always looking up over and over. A YAML sample of a Cloudformation or CDL snippet for a very specifically configured resource. A YAML sample of an Ansible module that does a thing. A Python sample of a specific lambda method. A regex for email addresses.

  • @lugal
    link
    222 months ago

    When I was a kid, I programmed a jump and run game and each time I found a bug, I made a new level in which you needed to use it.

  • @DTFpanda
    link
    162 months ago

    Sometimes I feel like the only non-tech worker on Lemmy. This place desperately needs more diversity

    • @Syrc
      link
      172 months ago

      That’s a normal consequence of more tech-savvy people leaving Reddit than others. Just gotta wait for spez to mess it up even more and we’ll get a wider variety of people here.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 months ago

        Oh boy, can’t wait for even more neoliberals to have such bold takes as “hmmm, both sides are bad, AKSHUALLY”

    • @RatBin
      link
      92 months ago

      This is a small niche site after all - logging in requires knowing about its existance - and reddit is very popular, but not in a good way. Even in disagreement, I have not found that level of hostility here. At some point reddit was starting to become a dead weight in my life, incapable of giving me unique informations.

    • @TORFdot0
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      Encourage your other non-tech friends and colleagues to join a Lemmy instance then. The fediverse hasn’t gotten big enough and normal people haven’t really gotten to the level of technical literacy yet to be able to come here organically yet

      We are here because we are nerds that already care about FOSS.

  • Decoy321
    link
    162 months ago

    I love the little bug holding up the stick supporting everything in the stack overflow.

    • Billegh
      link
      192 months ago

      Console is a log “file” on Linux. You could tail your pty if you really wanted to…

  • @recursivesive
    link
    5
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Where’s the console.log('here') ? That would be the equivalent of a “you are here” on a map.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    git bisect is just this guy jumping through portals to alternate universes where the bug either exists or doesn’t