• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1039 months ago

    Meh, just put your question and wrong answer in a meme and post it anywhere, within an hour everyone will correct it with the right answer 😂

      • astraeus
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        What’s funny is that watching The Endless Eight already feels like you’re watching 93,884,313,611 episodes of Haruhi

        • @Dagnet
          link
          59 months ago

          I seriously could not believe what I was watching when I got to that part. I would start the next one thinking “there is no way… Yep, again”. How did the director even convince people to do it?

          • astraeus
            link
            fedilink
            29 months ago

            As annoying as it was to slog through the episodes (I think I went through 5 of them before realizing I wasn’t missing much skipping the other three), there is something to be said about how much it captures that feeling of uselessness that Kyo and Yuki have. Kyo begins to realize each time and Yuki is forced to be aware through each repetition. Haruhi is so powerful that she creates an endless time loop, that was both amazing and terrifying.

            • @Dagnet
              link
              English
              19 months ago

              Thats the really weird part, Nagato could end it whenever she wanted, yet she always chooses to tell them just enough to keep it going forever

              • astraeus
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                She can’t interfere, her job is to monitor and observe and only stop Haruhi if she’s going to endanger the universe. So even with the ability to stop her, she can’t do anything by the code of her position.

                • @Dagnet
                  link
                  English
                  19 months ago

                  Thats the thing, she does interfere, but just enough that it keeps happening. 100% no interference would be not even telling them that there is a loop going on when they try to find out

    • Litanys
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      Correct. Always provide wrong answer. No one can withstand someone being wrong on the internet.

    • @StaticFalconar
      link
      39 months ago

      Obviously thats so wrong. The correct answer is to pray for the answer and keep taking naps until you get your answers.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      59 months ago

      Yeah, this list of sites is making me think of asking for a book by loudly asking a library, a series of coffeeshops, a chud microbrewery, and an 11-year-old bully. Try quietly reading in the library first, I guess.

  • Kaity
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Simultaneously the worst and funniest feeling, is searching for a solution and most of the responses/results are to go search for it. If your answer is that searching for an answer is an easy and quick solution, you contribute to disproving yourself.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      189 months ago

      Yeah this is one of the main reasons why Stackoverflow’s question closing policies are bullshit. We’re going to close the question so nobody can answer it… but they can still upvote it and it will still be ranked highly on Google!

      Bunch of idiots.

      You know the SO Devs actually tried to improve this a while ago - I think you would be able to reopen your question once or something. Of course the power-hungry mods hated that idea and the abandoned it.

      At this point it’s unfixable. They depend on their unpaid mods and they’ve already attracted the sort of people you absolutely don’t want to moderate a site.

      The only hack I’ve found is that if your question gets downvoted/closed you are allowed to delete it, wait half an hour and ask it again. Much better odds of success than editing the question.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19 months ago

        You can help by gaining points on multiple SE sites and participating in elections. Please vote!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          09 months ago

          You can’t. The kinds of people who are nominated are the wrong kinds of people. I’ve participated in many SO elections and none of the candidates ever mention any of these issues.

  • bruhduh
    link
    14
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Try chatgpt and the like, it’s gonna give you same barely correct answers, at least it isn’t gonna send you out, well… Most of the time

    • @devilish666OP
      link
      79 months ago

      ChatGPT is give you general answer not the right ones from my experience
      Sometimes you get the right answer if you fine tune your question…but sometimes don’t

      • bruhduh
        link
        79 months ago

        Same with stack overflow, in my experience at least) i just googled questions btw, not started them, so in my personal experience chatgpt is google++

      • bruhduh
        link
        19 months ago

        Yes, that’s what I’m thanking about)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      109 months ago

      most people don’t know how to properly formulate questions and it shows. 90% of new questions on SO are just bottom barrel which is why the rules are so strict about quality.

      • @RadicalEagle
        link
        139 months ago

        Absolutely true, but it’s also more difficult to ask a good question when you don’t know anything about what you’re asking.

        People who know a lot about a topic can ask very good questions about that topic.

        The problem I see with most questions people post online is that they make too many assumptions that their audience will will magically understand the context of their question.

        Good questions require relevant context.

        Determining relevancy requires expertise.

        Expertise comes from experience.

        No matter how many questions you ask and answers you get you’ll never “understand” something until you do it.

        Instead of asking questions like “How do I do X?” people should be asking “I’m trying to accomplish X, I’ve tried Y, but I’m encountering Z. How could I resolve this?”

        I guess my rule is that you should never ask someone a question without first trying to answer it yourself.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          100% agree, and the new question page on SO makes most of those points but generally people dont read it. It would be kinda nice if they integrated an LLM to double check if questions need improvement before they get submitted.

  • Spider
    link
    fedilink
    139 months ago

    Stack Overflow isn’t a tutor site. It’s a wiki. Its usefulness would plummet if duplicate questions are allowed, since that would scatter all the answers.

    • bruhduh
      link
      17
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Then it should allow to connect duplicates as sub questions to main question which they keep as original, Wikipedia allow additions to articles after all, i mean if you comment your question under main question, who gonna look at that?

      • @ripcord
        link
        29 months ago

        People do look at that eventually, but not as fast as some people want.

    • @ripcord
      link
      89 months ago

      It’s also weird to me that people seem to primarily use it to ask questions (and get butthurt about getting duplicates). It’s really rare that I ever don’t find an answer there (which often is buried in responses, but still). Like I’ve virtually never been motivated to post there.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    109 months ago

    If it’s a question I know how to answer but believe it really it would take 30 seconds of searching for a regular person to find…

    I’d give the answer but be a bit snarky about it.

      • @RadicalEagle
        link
        99 months ago

        Honestly, yeah sometimes. It’s my emotional reflex to frustration that was programmed into me by my parents and I haven’t done enough cognitive behavioral therapy to undo it.

        • Rusty Shackleford
          link
          fedilink
          English
          59 months ago

          As someone who discovered my Type 1 ASD at 40, the gods know that I have a lot more work to do on my self-awareness and abrasiveness.

          Not saying you should adopt this, but sometimes I read aloud what I type and imagine myself replying to a student in real life in the way of and with the tone that people sometimes have on StackOverflow.

          My gut reaction at that point, usually, is to rewrite a response or post completely with a more generous dose of humility and compassion.

          I don’t always get it right, but when I remember to do that and read replies, I like myself a little bit more.

          • @RadicalEagle
            link
            39 months ago

            I’ve been thinking about this a bit more, and I realized that I talk to other people the way I talk to myself. This probably wouldn’t be a problem if I weren’t so critical of myself.

            I think I need to not only put in the effort to reread the things I write when communicating with others, but also to just be kinder to myself in my internal monologue.

            I spend too much time being frustrated inside my own head, and that makes it easy to use that same tone when I’m interacting with other people.

            Thanks for sharing your advice. I think verbalizing my thoughts the way you suggested will be really helpful.

            • Rusty Shackleford
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              This probably wouldn’t be a problem if I weren’t so critical of myself.

              Same.

              I spend too much time being frustrated inside my own head, and that makes it easy to use that same tone when I’m interacting with other people.

              Same.

              My Dad’s neighbors always say:

              Hurt people hurt people.

              And as a counterpoint to that, from Slavoj Zizek:

              Never presume that your suffering is, in itself, a proof of your authenticity.

              Just because we wrestle with ourselves internally, it doesn’t justify our perniciousness to others.

              Uncle Iroh nailed it:

              Sometimes the best way to solve your own problems is to help someone else.

              I just don’t wanna sound like an asshole when I attempt to do that!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        39 months ago

        It’s not about feeling better. It’s about getting the other person to understand that Google exists and that they can use it, too. Too many people refuse to put in any effort of their own and go ask someone instead.

        IMHO in that situation answering isn’t even the right thing to do, since it encourages that behaviour and prevents the asker from learning to find out stuff for themselves. Something about fishing for hungry people or so…

        When someone is genuinely stuck, doing research themselves allows the answerer not to go down the same dead ends, which saves time for both.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      39 months ago

      If it’s on Stack Exchange, you can help us keep the community decent by assuming good faith and being patient with newcomers. Yes, it’s frustrating. And yeah, sometimes, it’s basically impossible to avoid sarcasm and scorn, just like how HN sometimes needs to be sneered at, but we can still strive for a maximum of civility.

      If all else fails, just remember: you’re not on Philosophy SE or any of the religious communities, it’s just a computer question, and it can be answered without devolving into an opinion war. Pat yourself on the back for being a “schmott guy!” and write a polite answer that hopefully the newbies will grok. Be respectful of plural perspectives; it’s a feature that a question may have multiple well-liked answers.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    49 months ago

    As someone who works in IT, and specifically networking and security, the “trade subs” are honestly what I miss.most from reddit. Places like sysadmin, Cisco, Fortinet, talesfromtechsupport, etc.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -59 months ago

    Peple misunderstand “Closed as duplicate” as an insult, when it’s just the hint to look at the provided link. If you didn’t find the answer previously, this just means there are multiple ways to express the problem, which use different words and thus don’t all find the same google result.

    • @Heavybell
      link
      English
      209 months ago

      It’s annoying when it is not a duplicate tho

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        That’s fair, but if you edit the question to explain how it’s different (without which, how could anyone even answer your question?), it can be (and often is) reopened.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      But it’s those people who close it as a duplicate and not post the link to a valuable answer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        59 months ago

        You cannot even mark it as duplicate without providing a link to the answer. What are you talking about?

          • @MotoAsh
            link
            39 months ago

            No, it is always the same question.

            … from a person sitting in a very different situation with a slightly different problem.

            • @marcos
              link
              69 months ago

              Some times the question has no semblance at all. Other times the answer has no semblance at all. Some times there’s no answer at all. And obviously, modern SO is full of people that will just post a ridiculously incorrect answer. There is a wide variety of possibilities!

              I remember being very surprised as a I followed one of those links and got the answer I needed. But I don’t remember exactly when.

              • @MotoAsh
                link
                19 months ago

                I’ve had both happen a lot. Only the basic stuff gets a correct answer, because nuance is difficult even for the tech savvy.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              29 months ago

              At the very least it has some of the same words. And the person marking it as duplicate figured it was probably the same.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      They also changed the wording from “closed” to “on hold” years ago, and I don’t think I’ve ever seen the people complaining about the site take any notice.

      • JoYo 🇺🇸
        link
        fedilink
        English
        49 months ago

        It’s because they don’t use the site and they don’t have a problem to solve. They’re just here to complain.