The former president accused Judge Juan Merchan’s daughter of presenting a conflict of interest, possibly violating a gag order

Donald Trump launched yet another attack against the daughter of New York Supreme Court Justice Juan Merchan, who is overseeing the trial regarding the former president’s alleged hush money payments to adult film actress Stormy Daniels.

In a Truth Social post on Saturday, Trump shared a link to a New York Post article about the judge’s daughter, who has consulted to Democratic campaigns, and wrote, “This is a disgrace to our Legal System. Judge Merchan should be immediately sanctioned and recused, and this fake ‘case,’ only kept alive by the Highly Conflicted Judge, should be completely dismissed right away.” The post included photos of Merchan’s daughter. Rolling Stone has withheld her name as she is not involved in the case.

Trump has attacked the judge’s daughter at least three other times in the last week. The judge issued a gag order on Tuesday — hours after Trump attacked his daughter — barring the former president from discussing witnesses and others involved in the case. On Thursday, District Attorney Alan Bragg requested Judge Merchan clarify whether the gag order applies to Trump’s attacks against the his daughter, and if not, he asked the judge to expand the order to include her and others.

  • @Lemming421
    link
    English
    2636 months ago

    Boy, sure would be nice if there were literally any consequences at all for him, wouldn’t it?

    • @VubDapple
      link
      636 months ago

      Everyone’s afraid of him because of his mob and death threats, personal career consequences and the possibility that he comes back to power in which case all of the above multiplied.

      • @krashmo
        link
        866 months ago

        Letting fear make your decisions is not something a public servant should be doing. Most people call cops out for that sort of thing so why would we tolerate it from a judge who is in an arguably more important position?

        Ideally public servants would be more afraid of what the public will do to them if they don’t do the right thing but we’ve let ourselves be “civilized” to the point that they know nothing will happen.

        • @chemical_cutthroat
          link
          366 months ago

          The public hasn’t been violent enough for a long time. No one is scared of the public.

          • Optional
            link
            276 months ago

            That’s not what fox news says. I’m told if you live in one of those big cities you’ll get murderized immediately, probably by a illegal or on o’ them diverse people!

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              56 months ago

              Yes but that’s vastly different then convincing them that the hand feeding them just enough table scraps to keep from starving is sitting on a hoard.

        • IHeartBadCode
          link
          fedilink
          76 months ago

          so why would we tolerate it from a judge who is in an arguably more important position?

          Because the person being tossed into jail could very well become the most important position. No nation is above political retaliation and the reality of a mob murdering the judge and daughter and then subsequently getting full pardons from that most important position is a non-zero value.

          Given the weakness that exudes from Congress on Impeachment, there’s zero ramifications for such a situation. And given the nature of Trump, there’s zero compunction that would ever keep him from this situation arising.

          Everyone fears the “official” acts that Trump can carry out. Smarter people understand the non-official actions that he can give a nod to and give comfort to. That’s how truly corrupt governments work, not by official acts, but the non-official ones.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            106 months ago

            Not ever doing anything to punish him makes it feel like voting is meaningless. Why participate in a system that doesn’t even pretend to hold someone who flagrantly breaks the law and ignores judge’s orders with zero repercussions?

            • d00phy
              link
              English
              106 months ago

              You just hit on one of the main reasons a lot of folks think we are watching the decline of the US to… something. Could be a failed state, could be dictatorship/fascism. Could be a handful of smaller countries. Nobody really knows at this point. The future just doesn’t look real bright, and hasn’t for awhile.

          • 2fat4that
            link
            fedilink
            26 months ago

            If you stay the course, you will have another Putin. Better to get the retaliation of his constituents out of the way now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            3
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Exactly. Which is why he’s allowed to do whatever he wants. He’s got America by the balls that it only wished it had, and everyone knows it. So I don’t really know why this is even a big deal to anyone anymore.

            It’s just status quo.

        • @Breezy
          link
          36 months ago

          Bomb the shit outta them, then use tax payer money to rebuild their homes.

      • @Username02
        link
        136 months ago

        So you mean if the left acts a bit violently we could have better healthcare, higher minimum wage, enshrine abortion rights, transition into green energy, stop funding genocide, toss insurrectionists into jail, and all other good stuff?

        • @rayyy
          cake
          link
          86 months ago

          Yes and no. The right can act violently with little consequences - witness Oklahoma bombing, Ammon Bundy and the Jan6 insurrectionists. The left, and any associates would have been immediately stomped into the ground, like 6 feet under, because the right has big money backing it.

          • @Maggoty
            link
            16 months ago

            Oklahoma bombing is a bad example. I’d go with the right wing groups that attack protests held by the left.

      • Capt. Wolf
        link
        66 months ago

        “Let not any one pacify his conscience by the delusion that he can do no harm if he takes no part, and forms no opinion. Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should look on and do nothing. He is not a good man who, without a protest, allows wrong to be committed in his name, and with the means which he helps to supply, because he will not trouble himself to use his mind on the subject.” - John Stuart Mill, 1867

  • Jesus
    link
    606 months ago

    I look forward to seeing a judge that is brave enough to throw this dude in jail for being in contempt of court. Someone if going to have to risk their wellbeing in order to do that.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    426 months ago

    There were some people, I can’t remember who they were, that regularly chanted about locking someone up…

    • Optional
      link
      146 months ago

      Oh yeah but then they drained the swamp, mmm hmmm. Which was nice.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        156 months ago

        Sort of like how Elon was going to rid Twitter of bots once he bought the company.

        • @takeda
          link
          56 months ago

          Well, he doesn’t need bots to manipulate Twitter anymore.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              56 months ago

              Yes, but he let a sink in. Don’t forget about the sink. And on top, nobody understands manufacturing better, he invented space travel and he’s the most american American that can americans.

              From Africa.

  • Optional
    link
    336 months ago

    For the most people in jail per capita with the most heavily militarized police force and practically zero accountability, this nation is a fucking joke at enforcing the law on rich white men.

    Which, of course, is the entire point.

  • DarkGamer
    link
    fedilink
    286 months ago

    Take the kid gloves off, treat him like a normal defendant, what would happen to a normal person if they used stochastic terrorism against a Judge’s family?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    27
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Judge: “Shut the fuck up.”

    Lawyers: “Donald, you have to shut the fuck up, seriously!”

    Donald: “No!” pouts

  • Orbituary
    link
    266 months ago

    He totally deserves that 10 day, 60% reduction in his obligations.

  • @frickineh
    link
    246 months ago

    Ooh, ooh, now do Clarence Thomas, you orange piece of shit.

  • linuxgator
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 months ago

    Next time they issue a gag order for him, it should include an actual ball gag and Chinese finger cuffs.

    • @Furbag
      link
      10
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Chinese finger cuffs

      Can’t find one small enough for those little sausage fingers.

  • @rustyfish
    link
    116 months ago

    Is he still going for the “provoke a punishment that could be seen as an overreaction so he can appeal and win easily”-thing or is he a dumbass just as usual?

    • Kbin_space_program
      link
      fedilink
      166 months ago

      Until he faces consequences for this, there is no downside to him.

      And the longer it takes for there to be consequences, the better it is for him when they happen, as it is increasingly attributed to him “being right” to his cult.