Over 75% of FreeCAD users are willing to pay to see it improved | Ondsel
ondsel.com
This is the last post in the series where we discuss the takeaways from our recent user research. We already looked at basic demographics data and the use of 3rd-party addons for getting a job done. Now it’s time to talk about things that annoy users so much they are willing to pay to get these issues nuked from orbit.

From the article:

Note: as a for-profit company, we are certainly interested in knowing what users are willing to pay for. If we’re going to survive, we have to do that. But that was not our primary motivation in asking these specific questions. FreeCAD is not only free-as-in-speech, it’s also free-as-in-beer. We wanted to know if that was the main reason that people use it.

Our thinking is that if users are willing to sacrifice financially to make the software better, then it means they value the ‘free-as-in-freedom’ aspect of FreeCAD even more. It would give us confidence that we can build a business model that gives users real value and is also financially sustainable. We were blown-away by the results.

  • @j4k3English
    2•9 months ago

    I will not support this. I love FOSS, and would not have learned without FreeCAD. The vast majority of FreeCAD users are not on any one platform. Claiming that any one platform’s polling results are relevant to the majority is patently false. I do not support a for profit company doing anything like this and look at this as a potential path to hostile future actions by the likes of worthless companies I despise like Autodesk. For profit ultimately mean for sale to a bigger fish and that always leads to exploitation. Such a move is the eventual implosion of FreeCAD. I am very sad to see any for profit involvement in FreeCAD.

    • @wjriiOPMEnglish
      6•9 months ago

      So far, they have not shown themselves to be bad actors. Their current business model is to contribute to the FOSS project, and also to build out a small-market PDM solution that bolts onto it. Most of their developers were already part of the project before the company was founded. The article itself certainly makes a sales pitch, but it also directs readers to FreeCAD’s official grant program.

      I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt, and if they do nothing more than push FreeCAD towards v1.0 with the RealThunder toponaming mitigation re-coded and integrated, then they will have been a net positive. I actually expect they will run out of money before they can do any real damage to the community, assuming they would like to. Even OnShape apparently only had about 5,000 paying customers when they were bought by PTC. This is an oddly small industry outside the main players.