- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
WASHINGTON—Explaining why the United States would not call on Israel to end its continuous airstrikes on Palestinian civilians, the White House warned Wednesday that a ceasefire in Gaza would only serve to benefit humanity. “We know there are voices across the world calling for a ceasefire, but what everyone needs to understand is that the only people who stand to gain from halting the bombing campaign are people who deeply value human life,” President Biden said in an Oval Office address, adding that if Israel was not given time to collectively punish all 2.3 million people who live in Gaza, it would be a great victory for anyone who believes civilians are entitled to basic dignity and security for themselves and their families. “We cannot allow that happen. These humanitarian concerns may be valid, but right now, a pause in hostilities would advance the interests of no one but innocent Palestinians, the many U.S. citizens living in Gaza, and the more than 200 Israelis who were violently abducted by Hamas and are currently being held in unknown locations. That’s not what America stands for.” Biden later extended the argument to explain why the United States spent billions on military aid for Israel while it spent mere millions on humanitarian aid for Gaza.
The Onion about to throw hands with the white house
Guess the Hillary Clinton bestie who bought The Onion and then pushed them to post articles like this primary election campaign ad either sold it or eased up on the editorial meddling.
Either way, I love it!
Second one is a bit close to reality with all the genocide denying the administration has been doing.
deleted by creator
Can’t have Empire be punished, after all.
They would not want that would they?
Democrats are ok if every single Palestinian is murdered by Israel.
That’s like saying progressives who protest vote or abstain are ok if every single Palestinian is murdered by Israel, they just also want to make sure nothing is done to protect LGBT rights, mitigate climate change, reduce income inequality, support unions, balance the supreme court, protect reproductive rights, lower student debt or lower gun violence.
why does supporting LGBT rights require you to support mass murder?