Plugins for fediverse platforms.

Where is this up to? Is anyone thinking along these lines?

I’ve seen @db0 espouse such (eg https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/comment/8581651) (sorry for the tag if annoying).

I’ve certainly thought of it myself … because it’s a pretty obvious idea for an ecosystem aiming for richness and sustainability.

Seems a perfect fit for reusable moderation tooling too, rather than each new platforms having that trouble.

This is essentially #bluesky 's idea it seems.

@fediverse
#fediverse

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    48 months ago

    It’s definitely a good idea. I’m not sure how high it is in priority when we still need to work on basic federation mechanics, but eventually I think it makes a lot of sense.

    • maegul (he/they)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      78 months ago

      Well, the thing about establishing a plugin interface is that it facilitates 3rd party work on the platform by decoupling core development and its build processes from the development of any additional feature which can be done in whatever tech stack or manner the plugin developer wants.

      When it comes to moderation tooling I’m honestly a little confused that there isn’t more work or noise around a developing a sideloaded tool. With the current lemmy APIs for instance, surely one could make a web app, for admins/moderators only, that consumed feeds, exposed the admin/moderator powers and then added whatever additional information or views, filters, notifications or aggregations that moderators want in whatever UI that works better for moderators. Any ML/AI could also be added, with resultant metadata (or any other data for that matter) stored in a separate database. I’m probably missing something here, but I’m honestly a little confused.

      • Die4Ever
        link
        fedilink
        17 months ago

        When it comes to moderation tooling I’m honestly a little confused that there isn’t more work or noise around a developing a sideloaded tool.

        Yeah we just need volunteers to dedicate their time to it. But it’s a lot easier to complain than it is to contribute.

  • Jeff Sikes
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    @maegul @db0 @fediverse

    The most promising project in terms of plugins is Bonfire (they call them extensions)

    Forkeys have a plugin system already. I’ve built a few things with it, but usage isn’t widespread, at least outside of Misskey. I wrote a bit about it and created some documentation. (Maegul your name is super familiar, apologies if you already knew about this)

    https://box464.com/posts/firefish-plugins-conclusion/

    • maegulOP
      link
      fedilink
      18 months ago

      @box464 @db0 @fediverse

      I’d forgotten about them (firefish/Misskey plugins) actually (we probably saw each other over on firefish “back in the day”).

    • db0
      link
      fedilink
      28 months ago

      I don’t think generic apub plugins will work, but a plugin system for lemmy makes a lot of sense and pople like me could then help add the features we need

        • db0
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          Plugin a thing in so many software, from firefox, to wordpress, to godot engine, to unity engine to whatever else. I doubt it’s something extraordinary to pull off

          • @Feathercrown
            link
            English
            18 months ago

            It requires a lot of effort if you didn’t originally plan for it

            • db0
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Year, tone down the smug “prs accepted”, mate. You’re just toxic