Nyeka Arnold is a sixth generation Austinite. Before they came to Austin, her family was enslaved just a few miles east of the city, in the cotton farming town of Webberville. It was her great-great-great grandfather, Rev. John Henry Winn, who founded St. John Freedom Colony in Austin in the early 1870s.

Community leadership seems to run in the family – in 2021, still without a college degree, Arnold co-founded the nonprofit Healing Project. That same year during Winter Storm Uri, she drove down Austin’s frozen roads in a white van, personally picking up more than 200 homeless Austinites and bringing them to warming shelters.

Though Arnold’s family have been leaders in Austin longer than the University of Texas has existed, none have attended. For most of the university’s history it would’ve been impossible. UT resisted integration even after a Supreme Court ruling demanded it, and it wasn’t until 1956that it accepted its first Black students.

Arnold herself was 12 or 13 before she ever stepped foot on campus. It was a field trip to visit the Longhorns women’s basketball team.

“I got my poster signed by this young lady named Tiffany, and she was a Black woman,” she said. “And that was something I could relate to. She showed me love and she saw me. And I was so nervous, just so star-struck because she looked like a star in my eyes, going to the university.”

Arnold, now a mother of two, became the first person in her family to attend college last year, pursuing her bachelors from Austin Community College. This January, she also started coursework in UT Austin’s WIELD Texas, a two-year executive leadership and entrepreneurship program that not only teaches women of color practical skills, but also emphasizes networking in the community. The goal was to help women of color get hired in high-power roles and attract investors. Under the umbrella of Diversity, Equity and Inclusivity (DEI), WIELD and its sister program the Product Prodigy Institute have ended every semester with a Shark Tank-style “Demo Day,” which sees diverse students pitching their business ideas to real-life investors in the community.

But now, just one semester in, Arnold’s losing her shot to learn at UT. The WIELD program is one of the DEI initiatives the university announcedTuesday that it would dissolve. At least 60 people were laid off this week following a March 26 letterfrom state Sen. Brandon Creighton which warned that “merely renaming DEI offices or positions” would not comply with Senate Bill 17, the state’s new law banning DEI at public schools. The larger Division of Campus and Community Engagement that houses the WIELD program had already undergone changes to ensure all programs were in compliance with the law.

“I thought I would never be able to touch this environment, and now that has been taken away,” Arnold said. “And it feels like Jim Crow.”

Denné Reed, a UT anthropologist who was also DEI coordinator for his department, feels similarly. He still has his job, but his DEI work has been eliminated. “I honestly feel that Texas is hostile to fairness,” Reed said. “It feels like the bad old days of Jim Crow racist stupidity are making a resurgence.”

Arnold doesn’t know how completing WIELD would have changed her life, but she knows how it’s altered other people’s lives. While most of WIELD’s students are enrolled at UT Austin, some community members, like Arnold, audit classes. Product Prodigy graduate Rodolfo Galván Martínez said the program’s founder and instructor, Rubén Cantú, fought for that auditing option. “If it weren’t for him, I wouldn’t be where I am today.” Galván Martínez graduated from Texas State, but he describes his time in Product Prodigy as life-changing. A DACA recipient, Galván Martínez now works as a software engineer at IBM in Boston. “All my cousins, my dad, my stepdad, my uncles – they all work in construction. Quite literally building Austin, right? And I think that’s amazing work. But you know, what I’m doing now, building software to help in aviation, that’s something that’s completely new. It’s not something that I would have gotten intrinsically through my family.”

Robert Hudson was one of the first students to audit the Product Prodigy program when it launched in 2019. A Black man raised in rural Alabama by his grandmother who worked at a chicken factory, Hudson doesn’t hold a college degree. But, in part thanks to the program, he now works in Human Resources at a major nonprofit in Austin.

“When I first stepped on campus at UT it felt weird. It did. It is not welcoming at all,” Hudson said. He described the Office of Inclusive Innovation and Entrepreneurship, led by Cantú, as the one place on campus where he felt he could be himself. “Rubén was creating a place where we could challenge these spaces that are not letting us in to not only let us in but to let us be us.”

In a public statement on the office’s Instagramaccount, Cantú described the decision to dissolve the programs as coming, “both rapidly and unexpectedly.” It’s unclear if Cantú will still have a role at UT when the office closes July 5. UT spokespeople had not responded to our request to comment as of publication.

For Galván Martínez, reading the news about the office’s closure was devastating. “This decision, it will be so impactful – for many people who don’t even know that they’re impacted right now. They won’t know what they could’ve had,” he said. At the same time, it was no shock. “I don’t feel safe in Texas. And quite frankly, that’s one of the reasons why I decided to move.”

Hudson isn’t ready to leave, and Arnold is dedicated to Austin for life. They’re hanging on to hope that programs like Cantú’s will move somewhere else in town – maybe through a private school unaffected by SB 17, or through nonprofit partners.

“My p​​rofessor [Cantú] really genuinely loves his job,” Arnold said. “So when he tells us that he’s going to always be there, that he’ll teach under a tree if he has to, I honestly believe it.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That really, really sucks. It doesn’t matter to me how many generations they’ve been in Austin, just that it’s happening at all to people, and it sucks that UT’s hands are tied on this issue.

    Just emphasizes the point that voting in local elections (including State) matters, because the current State Legislature dogwhistling to their base with stupid culture war bullshit is the reason this is happening.

  • @malloc
    link
    English
    12 months ago

    I’m just brain storming. But what would is actually take to flip this state? The top positions and US senators have to win my majority (so gerrymandering doesn’t apply)

    In 2022, the top positions of this state were up for re-election (governor, lt gov, ag). Incumbents won by a large margin (800K-1M).

    Is it strictly low voter turnout impacting us from flipping? Or something else?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -10
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    There’s a whole lot of storytelling here and not a lot of facts.

    Was she accepted to UT as part of a DEI program? As in, other more-qualified students of other ethnicities lost a spot because of DEI programs? Sounds like affirmative action.

    E: downvotes for questions, I’m shocked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I literally just asked a question. Your downvotes and refusal to answer lead me to believe the answer is “yes” and your only rebuttal is a personal insult.

        If I’m wrong, show me. But the overwhelming emotional arguments and lack of any actual facts lead me to believe that’s the case.

        • Chozo
          link
          fedilink
          112 months ago

          I literally just asked a question.

          You didn’t just ask a question, you also injected your own narrative about “other more-qualified students” being denied positions, which is a gross misrepresentation of what DEI is. You don’t get to say you’re “just asking questions” when your questions come with baked-in narratives, Tucker.

          the overwhelming emotional arguments and lack of any actual facts

          “overwhelming emotional arguments”? One guy called you a racist, and wasn’t even arguing with you. If that was overwhelmingly emotional for you, maybe you’re not really ready to have your question answered.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -6
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            You didn’t just ask a question, you also injected your own narrative

            No? I didn’t.

            You don’t get to say you’re “just asking questions” when your questions come with baked-in narratives, Tucker.

            I didn’t. You may be projecting. And my name is not Tucker.

            “overwhelming emotional arguments”? One guy called you a racist

            I wasn’t referring to that. I was referring to the article, that spent it’s entirety painting a picture of this person and not containing any facts.

            Also still no one has even attempted to answer the question. Why is that?

            • Chozo
              link
              fedilink
              6
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Also still no one has even attempted to answer the question. Why is that?

              Because we recognize a bad-faith argument for what it is and don’t want to humor it.

              Alternatively, if you are not asking in bad faith and are actually just doing a horrifically poor job of posing your question neutrally, then you seem to lack a critical understanding of the subject at hand that needs to be dealt with before your question could even be addressed. Nobody is obligated to lay down that foundation for you, especially on a subject that has been discussed to death already.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -3
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Because we recognize a bad-faith argument for what it is and don’t want to humor it.

                Sure, sure. Don’t answer it because it’s “bad faith” and definitely not because you don’t have an answer. Just personal attacks, yeah that’ll get your point across.

                you seem to lack a critical understanding of the subject at hand that needs to be dealt with before your question could even be addressed.

                Answering my question would clear up any critical misunderstandings…

                Nobody is obligated to lay down that foundation for you

                You’re right. They’re also not obligated to lob personal attacks in lieu of actually answering the question, but they seem to have no problem with that?

                This is a discussion forum. If you want to have a discussion, please do so. If you don’t want to, don’t. No one is trying to force you.