You must log in or register to comment.
Meh. It’s a meme community. For most sites, alt-text is a prerequisite for accessibility compliance. For shitposts you could think of it is an act of generosity toward people with vision or cognitive impairment. Some people “abuse it” to tell The Real Joke. Anyway, folks who read it may not be a huge portion of those who enjoy your content, but yes, some of us notice and appreciate it.
I can’t see it. I stuck it in the markdown bars
but it doesn’t show when hovering the mouse. I can see it using elinks text-browser, so I guess it’s in there somewhere?
If the joke can be explained well using alt text I don’t see the harm in doing so even if very few people will read it. If there isn’t a clear or good way to explain the joke in the alt text then I don’t think it makes a lot of sense.
I personally try to use alt text where it makes sense (see this post of mine).
Markdown also allows for hover text:
[link name](url "hover text") This can be used to provide extra info when hovering over the image (also used in the post linked above). Hover text may be more appropriate for explaining the actual joke (I don’t know how hover text plays with screen readers though) or serve as a nice mirror of the image’s alt text.
tl;dr: you only should use alt text for memes where the joke can be translated into text format and use hover text if you want to give extra information.
I’ve edited to add the hover text, just to test. It’s working!
@Andonome I think this framing (which is relatively common) is the wrong way to think of it.
Does it make sense to exclude people that rely on alt text?
