• @swan_pr
    link
    English
    231 year ago

    I never thought I’d say this after reading an Arstechnica article, but this was beautifully written.

    • qprimed
      link
      fedilink
      English
      141 year ago

      just my take, but ars is one of the few commercial sites that can almost get an automatic headline upvote before reading the article… almost

      still a pretty impressive feat these days. hopefully it stays that way.

      • @swan_pr
        link
        English
        41 year ago

        Agreed, I never feel taken for a ride or baited into clicking their articles.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 year ago

      I thought the same thing! I can’t believe it’s already been a year, so amazing what we’ve been able to learn with Webb.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      My thought exactly. Really enjoyed this article. Thanks OP! I’m excited they are releasing more about their findings. I would also like to know what questions the new technology has answered beyond more dynamic pictures. I guess this photo wasn’t possible with Hubble?

  • @smitty
    link
    English
    111 year ago

    390 light years away

    As galactic scales go, that’s really close

    • Baron Von J
      link
      English
      21 year ago

      Does that mean the image is from 390 years ago?

      • @smitty
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Yes, if one of those stars blew up 389 years ago, we’d see it next year