• RuudMA
    link
    3951 year ago

    The user was banned immediately. Also rate limiting has been put in place on community creation. (Removing the communities takes some time however…)

    • Decoy321
      link
      881 year ago

      Hot damn, you are fast. Nice job!

      • Givesomefucks
        link
        fedilink
        531 year ago

        It happened at least a week ago and the user was banned at the same time

        OP is just reposting after the issue was already fixed.

        • @DudePluto
          link
          261 year ago

          Yeah even if this is a new new account of the same user, we could do without the why haven’t they been banned yet. I think we can all agree it takes time for the admins to notice these things - and they’re volunteers anyway. They need some leeway

          • @meeeeetch
            link
            11 year ago

            Why haven’t they been banned yet?

            Since you banned my main for…

      • @danc4498
        link
        111 year ago

        Why haven’t they been bann… Oh, they’re banned.

    • @Photographer
      link
      591 year ago

      Can we have a hard limit on community moderation so we never end up with POWER MODS which were one of the worst things about Reddit moderation.

      • RuudMA
        link
        741 year ago

        Lemmy doesn’t have an option for that but we’re looking into it

        • delirium
          link
          251 year ago

          I guess it’s achievable with hosting you’re using (with nginx ip block list for example if you’re using it)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            15
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            What you’re looking for is functionality like fail2ban, but probably with a filter set to the HTTP endpoint for creating communities. Not sure if it will work, I haven’t really looked into the Lemmy code/architecture yet.

          • ABeeinSpace
            link
            121 year ago

            If they’re using Cloudflare it can do this too. Even the free tier, you can have one monstrously long WAF rule to ban a bunch of IPs

        • itsame
          link
          41 year ago

          Spammers with a little bit of sanity in them will use VPN providers. The consequence is that IP banning effectively results in blocking VPN servers. For people like me, using VPN connections for genuine reasons (like a provider/government that cannot be trusted), this is problematic

        • @WireOwl
          link
          11 year ago

          I used to use stuff that had IP banning and it would just mean when I was on mobile data I would just randomly not be able to use it because some dick was wanding around getting IP banned using mobile data.

          People warrant IP banning userly are sad enough to find way of circumventing it and it’ll probably just makes issues for other users instead.

      • @boeman
        link
        11 year ago

        It’s so easy to change your IP address. All you’ll end up doing is banning a dynamic IP that someone else will get at some point

    • GeekFTW
      link
      fedilink
      891 year ago

      Having lived through the last 20 years, neither of those surprise me at all anymore lmao

    • Anarch157a
      link
      341 year ago

      It blows me away that the richest person in the world is one of those…

    • @MCForTheBest
      link
      71 year ago

      That’s not the mentality of a small child that’s the mentality of someone who actively refuses to take their medicine. There definitely has to be some underlying problem with them, if I were this mad I 1. wouldn’t do this and 2. would be over it within 2 minutes at most. This user can get fucked.

      • @WireOwl
        link
        11 year ago

        It actually might more be the dumbass thinks it’s like the guy who got domains for big companies in the early web and then sold them to them.

  • @ScOULaris
    link
    921 year ago

    Jeez. What a pathetic loser.

    • @Gelouse
      link
      361 year ago

      I can smell the cheetos-stained fingernails from here.

      • @mysoulishome
        link
        81 year ago

        Can’t even imagine why someone would waste their time like this. The instance is basically a non profit run by volunteers who believe in the technology…so let me just spend hours of my life trying to be a dick to them

  • ThrowawayOnLemmy
    link
    671 year ago

    Oh, that guys back? Yea he has some problems. We just let him think he’s doin something.

  • @daniskarma
    link
    571 year ago

    They should be charged for trying to attack a service using malicious practices. People only learn when their actions have consequences.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      361 year ago

      Agreed. People still think they’re invincible on the web. Tell that to a bouncer at a club or the police. They will f*** your s*** up.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Sure but this won’t stop until it’s not possible or worth the effort/resources. So I’m wondering if there’s a technical restriction that could be put in place for such behavior. Maybe instances should just start limiting the number of new communities someone can create in a certain amount of time on their instance.

      • @Pika
        link
        21 year ago

        I think one of admins commented saying he added in the last thing, saying there’s a delay but it takes time to delete the existing spam communities

  • Move to lemm.ee
    link
    42
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hexbear had a nerd like this in the first year, must have been 3 years ago now. They spammed John Kerry pictures and did it every single day for like 10 months.

    Serious waste of time/life.

  • @jiberish
    link
    331 year ago

    Is there a way to add this as a bug or feature request list for Lemmy? This seems like a concern that will need to be addressed at some point in the future. Maybe opening up communities created by banned users. Or adding a feature where users can report rogue moderators and allow communities to be liberated from rulers who become malicious or have their account hacked?

  • VampOP
    link
    271 year ago

    this makes it more or less impossible to search for Communities with numbers in the name at least for me because they have random strings of numbers in the description.

  • Dick Justice
    link
    101 year ago

    He made it impossible to search for wefwef before the name change

      • teft
        link
        51 year ago

        Vger.app? My Star Trek senses are tingling.

        • @popemichael
          link
          31 year ago

          V’ger and Voyager are both Star Trek references. I assume that it was done intentionally, but it’s cool with me either which way

    • 👽🍻👽
      link
      221 year ago

      Ruud took care of it a week ago. They answered elsewhere in the thread. OP posted this without bothering to check if it had been handled.

      • Piecemakers
        link
        51 year ago

        Maaan, that karma whore habit is hard to drop — even on a site devoid of any viable analog to it. 🤦🏼‍♂️

        • @MCForTheBest
          link
          11 year ago

          I wouldn’t attribute it to karma whoring and more to just being uninformed. Anyways, “Karma” exists on Lemmy, it’s just not displayed explicitly on the website and you’d need an app for it that shows the count (e.g. wefwef/voyager which shows your comment/post score).

  • @Machefi
    link
    -4
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

    • @Clipboards
      link
      321 year ago

      Inversely, why tolerate squatting? If you want to build the community up, great, but reserving is stupid if it isn’t done in good faith